Our cyber security products span from our next gen SIEM used in the most secure government and critical infrastructure environments, to automated cyber risk reporting applications for commercial and government organisations of all sizes.
In the UK, the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) runs an information assurance scheme called Cyber Essentials. It encourages organisations to adopt good practice in information security that will improve cyber resilience. It is an integral part of government and defence supply chain requirements that involve handling information – so anyone who wants to work with the public sector will find it is a requirement of those contracts. For other industries, Cyber Essentials provides tangible benefits if organisations choose to use it.
This is the first in a series of blog posts where we look at the Cyber Essentials information assurance scheme, explore how it works and discuss how it can operate as a baseline to develop cyber resilience.
The Cyber Essentials framework provides an accessible, plain-speaking method to improve an organisation’s security posture without having to hire a workforce of experts. The framework consists of five baseline technical controls:
Cyber Essentials operates with two levels of certification, both allowing organisations to use an assurance kitemark on their website or marketing material to show they have a reasonable level of cyber security within their enterprise.
The first level of certification, called ‘Cyber Essentials’, involves a simple three step process:
The higher level of certification, called ‘Cyber Essentials Plus’, requires an independent certification body to verify that the controls are in place. There are various advantages to be gained by having external validation of security controls being in place, for example, possibly reducing cyber insurance premiums or providing a competitive advantage in winning new business.
An issue organisations face when looking to elevate cyber security to the boardroom is they get asked which standard or framework is appropriate for their use.
When there is no clearly defined option or regulatory choice, the array of standards, frameworks and control lists can leave even the savviest IT managers scratching their heads. Furthermore, once they decide which to use, such as the American standard from NIST (their Cybersecurity Framework) or the international standard, ISO 27001, there is a long road ahead before they can say confidently, they are protecting the business. Adding to this issue is that the choice of controls is up to the organisation since standards set goals but don’t say how to achieve them. The problem isn’t which framework to use, it’s how you operationalise it.
A mature organisation will drive continuous security improvement from the top, with a well-maintained security policy, the delegation of authority ensuring clear communication of responsibilities and accountabilities and a means of assessing control effectiveness. Yet this level of maturity is far from where most businesses are.
Like all frameworks, standards and control sets, Cyber Essentials provides the security target organisations need to achieve; along with a key differentiator, it provides the practical aspects of how to do it. Once your security controls are established and independently verified, you can step back and take a breath, proud that you have achieved this milestone in your organisation’s security defences. Thereafter, Cyber Essentials requires an annual assessment.
If, like many organisations, you are concerned with cyber risk exposure in the intervening period throughout the year there are a few points worth noting which are outlined below.
Between each annual assessment day there are 364 days where your security controls could drift off course and expose the organisation to a cyber attack or serious data breach; your operating environment is dynamic which means your cyber security posture can be strong one day and compromised the next.
Building on the implementation of the Cyber Essentials controls, your next step up the cyber resilience ladder is to regularly assess that the controls you have in place are still working – preferably continuously. If you track performance over time, you can quickly see and have the opportunity to remediate security exposures that arise.
Like any operational monitoring system, such as engine management systems in cars, or even the waring beep on a fridge, continuous security control assessment is better than finding out your security systems have failed after a breach occurs or when the assessor next conducts your certification audit.
The good thing is that operational cyber security technology, such as the elements proposed by Cyber Essentials, can provide alarms when things change, much in the way the car or fridge tells the owner when something needs attention.
The ideal scenario is to collect the operational event logs from each of the Cyber Essentials technology systems – firewalls, software and patch management systems, configuration control systems and anti-malware technology, and present them in a ‘single pane of glass’ dashboard. This means that technical teams can instantly see when any of the controls stray away from their compliance target.
Huntsman Security’s Cyber Essentials solution dashboard
The business relies on a number of teams to manage risk; this goes way beyond the security operations team. Following on with the engine management system analogy, the high level non-technical expert (the car driver) is the first to receive an alert. Likewise, in cyber risk management, senior business risk owners are at the wheel, responsible for steering the direction of the company. They need to understand current exposure. Finding a way to automatically update all stakeholders will go a long way to raising awareness and building cyber resilience.
In this post we’ve given an overview of the Cyber Essentials scheme, explained how it provides a practical first step towards cyber resilience and then shared some insights into some future considerations – beyond the annual certification process.
In future posts we will look at the five baseline technical controls and how each one plays a vital role in an organisation’s security posture.
<<< Part 2a: Australia’s Essential Eight: Beyond Endpoint Control <<< Part 2b: Activating UK NCSC & US NIST Guidelines: Beyond Endpoint Control Part 4: Systematic Measurement of Cyber Controls >>> As much as we invest into cyber security controls, external threats are inevitable. In a recent Notifiable Data Breaches Report from the Office of the […]Read more
Keen campers, scouts and even the Swiss Army know – that a good penknife is indispensable. This simple device has mitigated many a disaster at one point in time or another. Whether it’s to cut through a bit of string, tighten a screw or simply to solve the problem of no bottle opener in the […]Read more
Supply chain risk is an area of cyber security that demands the ongoing attention of every enterprise; because it can make the difference between being resilient or not. It’s no surprise that insurers warn that the vulnerability of supply chains is potentially a systemic risk that can quickly propagate across supply chain dominated industries. Organisations […]Read more
It took a “tripartite cyber assessment” by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) to identify that a sample of financial organisations had inadequate cyber security: poor security control management, a lack of business recovery planning and inadequate 3rd party risk assessment. Why were there gaps? Where is the failure? Clearly the common practice of unsubstantiated […]Read more
The discussion over data-driven vs qualitative cyber security assessment has been going for some time. Nowadays, it is at the top of the priority list for many security and senior executive teams. Managing cyber security has always been a noble ambition but without reliable measurement, the lack of actionable information makes evidence-based management decisions almost […]Read more
Attack Surface Management (ASM) characterises a business’s security risks as the monitoring and risk mitigation of a constantly changing and vulnerable “risk-surface”. Importantly, this attack surface extends to both internal and external assets and services. Some ASM solutions deliver clear visibility across both Internet facing and internal assets. Others do not. Instead, they assess external […]Read more
The UK Government has released its annual “Cyber Security Breaches Survey 2023”. It provides some valuable insights into how cyber security is currently being managed in the UK, by a range of organisations. It also speaks to how current competing economic priorities are impacting the effectiveness of some cyber security management efforts. The full report […]Read more
Solving the mismatch between cyber security reporting and directors’ requirements You are undoubtedly familiar with the headlines; you may have even become in part desensitised to them: ‘Cyber-attacks are increasingly damaging’, or ‘large amounts of personal data are most at risk’. The important take-away, however, is that modern day thieves can easily gain access to […]Read more
A system to address the untrustworthy security environment Zero trust approaches to security have been talked about for a while; but in recent times they have certainly gained more currency. As a model for protecting data and services, the simplicity of the concept is its biggest strength – assume, as a default position, there is […]Read more
The ongoing protection of Critical Infrastructure from cyber-attacks has implications for us all – whether it’s supporting our health, well-being or simply our way of life, there is good reason to reflect on the effectiveness your cyber security. Cyber security risks are nothing new and the vulnerability of critical infrastructure to them (and the heightened […]Read more
Read by directors, executives, and security professionals globally, operating in the most complex of security environments.