Our cyber security products span from our next gen SIEM used in the most secure government and critical infrastructure environments, to automated cyber risk reporting applications for commercial and government organisations of all sizes.
In the UK, the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) runs an information assurance scheme called Cyber Essentials. It encourages organisations to adopt good practice in information security that will improve cyber resilience. It is an integral part of government and defence supply chain requirements that involve handling information – so anyone who wants to work with the public sector will find it is a requirement of those contracts. For other industries, Cyber Essentials provides tangible benefits if organisations choose to use it.
This is the first in a series of blog posts where we look at the Cyber Essentials information assurance scheme, explore how it works and discuss how it can operate as a baseline to develop cyber resilience.
The Cyber Essentials framework provides an accessible, plain-speaking method to improve an organisation’s security posture without having to hire a workforce of experts. The framework consists of five baseline technical controls:
Cyber Essentials operates with two levels of certification, both allowing organisations to use an assurance kitemark on their website or marketing material to show they have a reasonable level of cyber security within their enterprise.
The first level of certification, called ‘Cyber Essentials’, involves a simple three step process:
The higher level of certification, called ‘Cyber Essentials Plus’, requires an independent certification body to verify that the controls are in place. There are various advantages to be gained by having external validation of security controls being in place, for example, possibly reducing cyber insurance premiums or providing a competitive advantage in winning new business.
An issue organisations face when looking to elevate cyber security to the boardroom is they get asked which standard or framework is appropriate for their use.
When there is no clearly defined option or regulatory choice, the array of standards, frameworks and control lists can leave even the savviest IT managers scratching their heads. Furthermore, once they decide which to use, such as the American standard from NIST (their Cybersecurity Framework) or the international standard, ISO 27001, there is a long road ahead before they can say confidently, they are protecting the business. Adding to this issue is that the choice of controls is up to the organisation since standards set goals but don’t say how to achieve them. The problem isn’t which framework to use, it’s how you operationalise it.
A mature organisation will drive continuous security improvement from the top, with a well-maintained security policy, the delegation of authority ensuring clear communication of responsibilities and accountabilities and a means of assessing control effectiveness. Yet this level of maturity is far from where most businesses are.
Like all frameworks, standards and control sets, Cyber Essentials provides the security target organisations need to achieve; along with a key differentiator, it provides the practical aspects of how to do it. Once your security controls are established and independently verified, you can step back and take a breath, proud that you have achieved this milestone in your organisation’s security defences. Thereafter, Cyber Essentials requires an annual assessment.
If, like many organisations, you are concerned with cyber risk exposure in the intervening period throughout the year there are a few points worth noting which are outlined below.
Between each annual assessment day there are 364 days where your security controls could drift off course and expose the organisation to a cyber attack or serious data breach; your operating environment is dynamic which means your cyber security posture can be strong one day and compromised the next.
Building on the implementation of the Cyber Essentials controls, your next step up the cyber resilience ladder is to regularly assess that the controls you have in place are still working – preferably continuously. If you track performance over time, you can quickly see and have the opportunity to remediate security exposures that arise.
Like any operational monitoring system, such as engine management systems in cars, or even the waring beep on a fridge, continuous security control assessment is better than finding out your security systems have failed after a breach occurs or when the assessor next conducts your certification audit.
The good thing is that operational cyber security technology, such as the elements proposed by Cyber Essentials, can provide alarms when things change, much in the way the car or fridge tells the owner when something needs attention.
The ideal scenario is to collect the operational event logs from each of the Cyber Essentials technology systems – firewalls, software and patch management systems, configuration control systems and anti-malware technology, and present them in a ‘single pane of glass’ dashboard. This means that technical teams can instantly see when any of the controls stray away from their compliance target.
Huntsman Security’s Cyber Essentials solution dashboard
The business relies on a number of teams to manage risk; this goes way beyond the security operations team. Following on with the engine management system analogy, the high level non-technical expert (the car driver) is the first to receive an alert. Likewise, in cyber risk management, senior business risk owners are at the wheel, responsible for steering the direction of the company. They need to understand current exposure. Finding a way to automatically update all stakeholders will go a long way to raising awareness and building cyber resilience.
In this post we’ve given an overview of the Cyber Essentials scheme, explained how it provides a practical first step towards cyber resilience and then shared some insights into some future considerations – beyond the annual certification process.
In future posts we will look at the five baseline technical controls and how each one plays a vital role in an organisation’s security posture.
A recent KPMG Report suggests that protecting against and dealing with cyber risks will be the major challenge for senior executives in 2024. It is clear that despite high levels of security investment, organisations continue to suffer from cyber attacks.Read more
The Australian Signals Directorate’s (ASD) recent publication of their Cyber Threat Report 2022-2023 unearthed a range of areas for concern for government departments and critical infrastructure entities at local, State and Federal level.Read more
As cyber risks increase, organisations are encountering the longer life cycle of insurance renewals and the need to demonstrate better management of security controls and their effectiveness.Read more
Highlights and insights from the recent Managed Services Summit in London & the ISACA Central Chapter Conference on Digital Trust, in Birmingham, UK. With two recent conferences in the space of three days, some interesting challenges were very evident in the topics discussed. Being very different events, the challenges were quite different, but interestingly they […]Read more
In early August 2023, the latest joint advisory on persistent vulnerabilities was issued by the intelligence and security agencies of the “Five-eyes” community. These joint advisories are becoming more common. Perhaps recognising the growing importance of shared security information and the common nature of many of the threats faced – the weight they carry makes […]Read more
The quality of your risk assessment and the security information it provides is important; if you plan to use it to actively manage your operational and cyber resilience activities. Organisations are constantly exposed to a rapidly changing threat environment, so you really need a similarly rapid evidence-based feedback system that informs you of the ongoing […]Read more
The UK market has its own regulators, security standards and challenges. And while rulings from SEC in the US or the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) in Australia don’t apply to UK companies, for the most part, the observations are undoubtedly relevant and the resulting advice instructive. It would be wrong to think UK financial […]Read more
<<< Part 2a: Australia’s Essential Eight: Beyond Endpoint Control <<< Part 2b: Activating UK NCSC & US NIST Guidelines: Beyond Endpoint Control Part 4: Systematic Measurement of Cyber Controls >>> As much as we invest into cyber security controls, external threats are inevitable. In a recent Notifiable Data Breaches Report from the Office of the […]Read more
Keen campers, scouts and even the Swiss Army know – that a good penknife is indispensable. This simple device has mitigated many a disaster at one point in time or another. Whether it’s to cut through a bit of string, tighten a screw or simply to solve the problem of no bottle opener in the […]Read more
Supply chain risk is an area of cyber security that demands the ongoing attention of every enterprise; because it can make the difference between being resilient or not. It’s no surprise that insurers warn that the vulnerability of supply chains is potentially a systemic risk that can quickly propagate across supply chain dominated industries. Organisations […]Read more
Read by directors, executives, and security professionals globally, operating in the most complex of security environments.