Our cyber security products span from our next gen SIEM used in the most secure government and critical infrastructure environments, to automated cyber risk reporting applications for commercial and government organisations of all sizes.
This time the advisory covers the risks relating to managed services providers (MSPs), or similar organisations, whose “trusted connection” could be used as a vector to attack one or more other businesses. It also contemplates them being used as a key part of the defensive strategy for an organisation looking to outsource elements of their IT services and IT security defences. The guidance, initially, looks holistically at how to prevent a cyber attack:
The advice here is familiar and common to the anti-cyber attack and anti-ransomware mitigation steps recommended by many experts in the space. Preventing direct access to systems as well as preventing access being obtained by subversive users requires focus on:
Following focus on these initial defences, it’s important to recognise that the remaining controls and recommendations encompass cooperation and joint responsibility – things the MSP should do and things the Customer should do.
The individual steps aren’t repeated here, but the advisory warns both customers and MSPs (see here) of the specific tactical actions each must play in managing the risk of attack.
For example, concerning patching and applying updates, clearly there is a need for MSPs to apply patches to their own systems and any that they manage for their Customers. But also, Customers have a responsibility to patch their environments and assure themselves that their MSPs are doing likewise – both on systems they are paying them to manage and on any supporting infrastructure. Having visibility of this is vital, at both ends.
The advisory then expands to include a number of other mitigation strategies that we, at Huntsman Security, have talked about in depth before:
This advisory carefully addresses the risks faced by MSPs and their Customers when malicious cyber actors seek to target those MSPs in an effort to exploit their trusted provider-customer relationships. It adds to a body of advice which is now pretty much consistent across multiple jurisdictions. It includes aspects of previous advisories from the same group of agencies and reiterates the important steps and controls that MSPs and their Customers should take to protect themselves and their customers.
For more information on how to protect this risk vector and manage the effectiveness of your security controls, see our resource here or here for managed services provider security. Alternatively, there is a link to this Advisory here [Alert(AA22-131A)] which contains specific references to individual security agencies.
The UK market has its own regulators, security standards and challenges. And while rulings from SEC in the US or the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) in Australia don’t apply to UK companies, for the most part, the observations are undoubtedly relevant and the resulting advice instructive. It would be wrong to think UK financial […]Read more
<<< Part 2a: Australia’s Essential Eight: Beyond Endpoint Control <<< Part 2b: Activating UK NCSC & US NIST Guidelines: Beyond Endpoint Control Part 4: Systematic Measurement of Cyber Controls >>> As much as we invest into cyber security controls, external threats are inevitable. In a recent Notifiable Data Breaches Report from the Office of the […]Read more
Keen campers, scouts and even the Swiss Army know – that a good penknife is indispensable. This simple device has mitigated many a disaster at one point in time or another. Whether it’s to cut through a bit of string, tighten a screw or simply to solve the problem of no bottle opener in the […]Read more
Supply chain risk is an area of cyber security that demands the ongoing attention of every enterprise; because it can make the difference between being resilient or not. It’s no surprise that insurers warn that the vulnerability of supply chains is potentially a systemic risk that can quickly propagate across supply chain dominated industries. Organisations […]Read more
It took a “tripartite cyber assessment” by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) to identify that a sample of financial organisations had inadequate cyber security: poor security control management, a lack of business recovery planning and inadequate 3rd party risk assessment. Why were there gaps? Where is the failure? Clearly the common practice of unsubstantiated […]Read more
The discussion over data-driven vs qualitative cyber security assessment has been going for some time. Nowadays, it is at the top of the priority list for many security and senior executive teams. Managing cyber security has always been a noble ambition but without reliable measurement, the lack of actionable information makes evidence-based management decisions almost […]Read more
Attack Surface Management (ASM) characterises a business’s security risks as the monitoring and risk mitigation of a constantly changing and vulnerable “risk-surface”. Importantly, this attack surface extends to both internal and external assets and services. Some ASM solutions deliver clear visibility across both Internet facing and internal assets. Others do not. Instead, they assess external […]Read more
The UK Government has released its annual “Cyber Security Breaches Survey 2023”. It provides some valuable insights into how cyber security is currently being managed in the UK, by a range of organisations. It also speaks to how current competing economic priorities are impacting the effectiveness of some cyber security management efforts. The full report […]Read more
Solving the mismatch between cyber security reporting and directors’ requirements You are undoubtedly familiar with the headlines; you may have even become in part desensitised to them: ‘Cyber-attacks are increasingly damaging’, or ‘large amounts of personal data are most at risk’. The important take-away, however, is that modern day thieves can easily gain access to […]Read more
A system to address the untrustworthy security environment Zero trust approaches to security have been talked about for a while; but in recent times they have certainly gained more currency. As a model for protecting data and services, the simplicity of the concept is its biggest strength – assume, as a default position, there is […]Read more
Read by directors, executives, and security professionals globally, operating in the most complex of security environments.