Our cyber security products span from our next gen SIEM used in the most secure government and critical infrastructure environments, to automated cyber risk reporting applications for commercial and government organisations of all sizes.
This time the advisory covers the risks relating to managed services providers (MSPs), or similar organisations, whose “trusted connection” could be used as a vector to attack one or more other businesses. It also contemplates them being used as a key part of the defensive strategy for an organisation looking to outsource elements of their IT services and IT security defences. The guidance, initially, looks holistically at how to prevent a cyber attack:
The advice here is familiar and common to the anti-cyber attack and anti-ransomware mitigation steps recommended by many experts in the space. Preventing direct access to systems as well as preventing access being obtained by subversive users requires focus on:
Following focus on these initial defences, it’s important to recognise that the remaining controls and recommendations encompass cooperation and joint responsibility – things the MSP should do and things the Customer should do.
The individual steps aren’t repeated here, but the advisory warns both customers and MSPs (see here) of the specific tactical actions each must play in managing the risk of attack.
For example, concerning patching and applying updates, clearly there is a need for MSPs to apply patches to their own systems and any that they manage for their Customers. But also, Customers have a responsibility to patch their environments and assure themselves that their MSPs are doing likewise – both on systems they are paying them to manage and on any supporting infrastructure. Having visibility of this is vital, at both ends.
The advisory then expands to include a number of other mitigation strategies that we, at Huntsman Security, have talked about in depth before:
This advisory carefully addresses the risks faced by MSPs and their Customers when malicious cyber actors seek to target those MSPs in an effort to exploit their trusted provider-customer relationships. It adds to a body of advice which is now pretty much consistent across multiple jurisdictions. It includes aspects of previous advisories from the same group of agencies and reiterates the important steps and controls that MSPs and their Customers should take to protect themselves and their customers.
For more information on how to protect this risk vector and manage the effectiveness of your security controls, see our resource here or here for managed services provider security. Alternatively, there is a link to this Advisory here [Alert(AA22-131A)] which contains specific references to individual security agencies.
A recent KPMG Report suggests that protecting against and dealing with cyber risks will be the major challenge for senior executives in 2024. It is clear that despite high levels of security investment, organisations continue to suffer from cyber attacks.Read more
The Australian Signals Directorate’s (ASD) recent publication of their Cyber Threat Report 2022-2023 unearthed a range of areas for concern for government departments and critical infrastructure entities at local, State and Federal level.Read more
As cyber risks increase, organisations are encountering the longer life cycle of insurance renewals and the need to demonstrate better management of security controls and their effectiveness.Read more
Highlights and insights from the recent Managed Services Summit in London & the ISACA Central Chapter Conference on Digital Trust, in Birmingham, UK. With two recent conferences in the space of three days, some interesting challenges were very evident in the topics discussed. Being very different events, the challenges were quite different, but interestingly they […]Read more
In early August 2023, the latest joint advisory on persistent vulnerabilities was issued by the intelligence and security agencies of the “Five-eyes” community. These joint advisories are becoming more common. Perhaps recognising the growing importance of shared security information and the common nature of many of the threats faced – the weight they carry makes […]Read more
The quality of your risk assessment and the security information it provides is important; if you plan to use it to actively manage your operational and cyber resilience activities. Organisations are constantly exposed to a rapidly changing threat environment, so you really need a similarly rapid evidence-based feedback system that informs you of the ongoing […]Read more
The UK market has its own regulators, security standards and challenges. And while rulings from SEC in the US or the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) in Australia don’t apply to UK companies, for the most part, the observations are undoubtedly relevant and the resulting advice instructive. It would be wrong to think UK financial […]Read more
<<< Part 2a: Australia’s Essential Eight: Beyond Endpoint Control <<< Part 2b: Activating UK NCSC & US NIST Guidelines: Beyond Endpoint Control Part 4: Systematic Measurement of Cyber Controls >>> As much as we invest into cyber security controls, external threats are inevitable. In a recent Notifiable Data Breaches Report from the Office of the […]Read more
Keen campers, scouts and even the Swiss Army know – that a good penknife is indispensable. This simple device has mitigated many a disaster at one point in time or another. Whether it’s to cut through a bit of string, tighten a screw or simply to solve the problem of no bottle opener in the […]Read more
Supply chain risk is an area of cyber security that demands the ongoing attention of every enterprise; because it can make the difference between being resilient or not. It’s no surprise that insurers warn that the vulnerability of supply chains is potentially a systemic risk that can quickly propagate across supply chain dominated industries. Organisations […]Read more
Read by directors, executives, and security professionals globally, operating in the most complex of security environments.