Our cyber security products span from our next gen SIEM used in the most secure government and critical infrastructure environments, to automated cyber risk reporting applications for commercial and government organisations of all sizes.
APRA CPS 234, the new Australian Prudential Regulatory Authority (APRA) Prudential Standard came into effect on 1st July 2019. The prudential regulator has warned businesses not to be complacent; 36 breach notifications have been received in the first four months of the new regime.
There is no doubt that the financial services organisations would have been targets of a much greater number of attempted cyber-attacks. APRA board member Geoff Summerhayes comments that:
“These are just the ones that succeeded – and that we know about. With some cyber incidents taking years to detect, it’s entirely possible that one of the banks, insurers or super funds has been compromised and we simply don’t know about it”.
Here are some key steps to simplify the enormous task of improving your organisation’s cyber resilience.
In order to develop a plan to build and maintain cyber resilience, organisations must first baseline their current status and establish any “compliance gaps”.
Worryingly, APRA noted that 70 per cent of regulated entities self-reported their “compliance gaps” against the new regulation. This is a big number, particularly given the subjective nature of any self-assessment.
The Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) found a similar level of cyber resilience across 14 non-corporate Commonwealth entities: only four entities (29 per cent) had complied with mandatory government requirements for information security. You can read the full report here:
The cyber security landscape is changing all the time, an environment can be compliant one day and exposed the next.
The number of breaches evidenced across the almost 600 APRA CPS 234 regulated entities in the past four months is not alarming in itself. However, as Mr Summerhayes says, it reveals “areas of common weakness” many of which APRA had “called out repeatedly”. “For example, we have identified basic cyber hygiene as an ongoing area of concern” he said.
APRA CPS 234 states that entities must maintain an information security policy framework and controls commensurate with the criticality and sensitivity of information assets and their exposure to vulnerabilities and threats.
A chosen framework needs to be both effective and practical; if you can’t implement it or monitor compliance with it, you won’t fulfil regulatory obligations. A systematic means of regularly measuring compliance against an effective security framework or set of controls is a good basis upon which to start.
The Essential Eight Framework, created by Australian Government, is a prioritised list of just eight key security controls organisations can implement to better protect their systems against a range of adversaries. The Australian Signals Directorate (ASD) found that when assessed to be operating effectively, the top four alone mitigate 85% of targeted cyber-attacks.
The APRA CPS 234 standard requires that an organisation must test the effectiveness of its information security controls through a systematic testing programme. It must escalate and report to the Board or senior management any testing results that identify information security control deficiencies that cannot be remediated in a timely manner. By utilising a recognised set lead indicators or security controls like the ACSC Essential 8 Framework your level of resilience can be regularly tested against your regulatory obligations.
Regulatory Technologies (RegTech) have emerged and evolved to monitor and report on the efficacy of important security controls. They can operate automatically and continuously to alert upon any changes in security controls status to provide your security team with the time critical information they need to investigate and resolve incidents. You can read more on RegTech in our blog post here: https://www.huntsmansecurity.com/blog/regtech-and-cyber-security-compliance/
The demands of the new standard don’t end with step 2. Entities are required to undertake audit activities that include reviews of the design and operating effectiveness of information security controls, including those maintained by related parties and third parties. This is an enormous task for any organisation; that is why a systematic methodology for the measurement and reporting of resilience is so important.
As with step 2, testing of control effectiveness, RegTech can assist your organisation in fulfilling its requirements. The technology operates as an excellent tool for your security team to execute a systematic and objective cyber risk audit. The business can dynamically measure and understand its own cyber risk and free up enough time to do something about it. Moreover, you can use RegTech to audit the resilience of third party suppliers and establish a cyber trust index to identify resilient supply chain partners.
Your business’s cyber resilience can change quickly. It is no coincidence that regulatory bodies around the world are seeking greater transparency and timely risk information as to the cyber posture of regulated entities.
Cyber risk is becoming ubiquitous. By automating the monitoring and reporting of security control effectiveness organisations, particularly those operating critical infrastructure, can clearly visualise and report on their current cyber risk exposure while simultaneously targeting resources to resolve cyber issues that matter.
A recent KPMG Report suggests that protecting against and dealing with cyber risks will be the major challenge for senior executives in 2024. It is clear that despite high levels of security investment, organisations continue to suffer from cyber attacks.Read more
The Australian Signals Directorate’s (ASD) recent publication of their Cyber Threat Report 2022-2023 unearthed a range of areas for concern for government departments and critical infrastructure entities at local, State and Federal level.Read more
As cyber risks increase, organisations are encountering the longer life cycle of insurance renewals and the need to demonstrate better management of security controls and their effectiveness.Read more
Highlights and insights from the recent Managed Services Summit in London & the ISACA Central Chapter Conference on Digital Trust, in Birmingham, UK. With two recent conferences in the space of three days, some interesting challenges were very evident in the topics discussed. Being very different events, the challenges were quite different, but interestingly they […]Read more
In early August 2023, the latest joint advisory on persistent vulnerabilities was issued by the intelligence and security agencies of the “Five-eyes” community. These joint advisories are becoming more common. Perhaps recognising the growing importance of shared security information and the common nature of many of the threats faced – the weight they carry makes […]Read more
The quality of your risk assessment and the security information it provides is important; if you plan to use it to actively manage your operational and cyber resilience activities. Organisations are constantly exposed to a rapidly changing threat environment, so you really need a similarly rapid evidence-based feedback system that informs you of the ongoing […]Read more
The UK market has its own regulators, security standards and challenges. And while rulings from SEC in the US or the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) in Australia don’t apply to UK companies, for the most part, the observations are undoubtedly relevant and the resulting advice instructive. It would be wrong to think UK financial […]Read more
<<< Part 2a: Australia’s Essential Eight: Beyond Endpoint Control <<< Part 2b: Activating UK NCSC & US NIST Guidelines: Beyond Endpoint Control Part 4: Systematic Measurement of Cyber Controls >>> As much as we invest into cyber security controls, external threats are inevitable. In a recent Notifiable Data Breaches Report from the Office of the […]Read more
Keen campers, scouts and even the Swiss Army know – that a good penknife is indispensable. This simple device has mitigated many a disaster at one point in time or another. Whether it’s to cut through a bit of string, tighten a screw or simply to solve the problem of no bottle opener in the […]Read more
Supply chain risk is an area of cyber security that demands the ongoing attention of every enterprise; because it can make the difference between being resilient or not. It’s no surprise that insurers warn that the vulnerability of supply chains is potentially a systemic risk that can quickly propagate across supply chain dominated industries. Organisations […]Read more
Read by directors, executives, and security professionals globally, operating in the most complex of security environments.