Our cyber security products span from our next gen SIEM used in the most secure government and critical infrastructure environments, to automated cyber risk reporting applications for commercial and government organisations of all sizes.
Various factors are converging to influence the need for better management of cyber security risk. Whether it’s to understand the effectiveness of security controls, isolate any weaknesses or to simply acknowledge cyber security as a corporate governance issue; the requirement for greater visibility of an organisation’s cyber security posture is a given.
Whilst the need for cyber risk measurement is widely acknowledged, delivery of reliable metrics is an ongoing challenge. Better cyber risk management requires better tools, tools that measure risk, discern change, identify gaps and map trends in a timely manner.
Security teams are rightly focused on defending their enterprise against attack. Using sophisticated threat detection and SIEM solutions SOC teams seek to isolate the threats likely to impact their businesses. Their defensive efforts are demanding and ongoing but ultimately, they lack some vital risk information that would massively assist their investigation and response efforts. Just imagine knowing where the gaps in your organisation’s security defences lie; and how it would assist SOC teams in improving risk management outcomes and raising the effectiveness of security controls.
Organisations should be asking some important questions: Are our risk mitigation efforts operational; and if so, how effective are they? Can we measure any gaps in their effectiveness to better manage our response efforts? By identifying these “uncontrolled” risks organisations can mitigate them and improve their security posture.
This sort of performance data can only come from within the organisation itself; where the state of cyber security controls can be dynamically measured and residual risks that might pose a threat to the enterprise determined. To be effective, security controls demand continuous, concise and systematic risk information.
New technologies are now emerging that provide security stakeholders with real-time visibility of the effectiveness of their organisation’s security controls. This enables CISOs and risk executives to prioritise any remaining residual risks and quickly implement management strategies to contain or remediate them.
In order to measure risk effectively it’s important that even the smallest change can be quantified and a risk management response initiated. In cyber security a risk can change and quickly escalate to something that can threaten the business; that is why reliable, automated measurement processes are important. Adopting a systematic procedure across a standard cyber security framework is a good way to maintain the objective and repeatable assessment of security controls. There are a number of these frameworks in use around the world, many with significant similarities; ACSC Essential 8 (Australia), NCSC Top 10 (UK) and NIST (USA).
Australia’s ACSC Essential 8 Framework incorporates the eight most fundamental mitigation strategies. It is simple, measurable and has been found to mitigate 85% of targeted attacks. The framework embraces security controls for attack prevention, limitation of spread and data recovery and system availability.
Huntsman Security has released two cyber risk management tools, both designed to automatically measure each of the Essential 8 security controls effectiveness and provide reliable performance metrics.
The Essential 8 Auditor executes a cyber risk audit and delivers an immediate view of an organisation’s security controls’ effectiveness. The Auditor confirms the presence of each control and determines the maturity level of those controls across the enterprise. The product can be used for internal cyber risk measurement, annual cyber risk attestations and as a benchmarking and performance management tool for security consultants, auditors and risk & compliance managers.
The Essential 8 Scorecard is broader in its capabilities. It provides the continuous audit and scoring of each of the Essential 8 controls; alerting immediately when any pre-set compliance levels are breached. The Scorecard includes a live dashboard for real-time diagnostics and response and automatically generates and distributes senior executive reports.
The Essential 8 Scorecard supports operations teams by identifying and providing information to mitigate ineffective controls so that SOC teams can better manage their pro-active and defensive security effort. Specialised operations and senior management focused reports provide performance trends for prioritising effort where and when it is needed most.
These new cyber risk management tools provide key risk information for operational and senior executive stakeholders to:
Whether you are looking to simply baseline the effectiveness of an organisation’s security controls or you want a tool to continuously measure and dynamically manage cyber risk, Huntsman Security’s Essential 8 products provide automated cyber risk measurement capabilities to assist risk management efforts and ultimately improve cyber resilience.
For more information about measuring the effectiveness of your cyber security controls please contact Huntsman Security.
<<< Part 2a: Australia’s Essential Eight: Beyond Endpoint Control <<< Part 2b: Activating UK NCSC & US NIST Guidelines: Beyond Endpoint Control Part 4: Systematic Measurement of Cyber Controls >>> As much as we invest into cyber security controls, external threats are inevitable. In a recent Notifiable Data Breaches Report from the Office of the […]Read more
Keen campers, scouts and even the Swiss Army know – that a good penknife is indispensable. This simple device has mitigated many a disaster at one point in time or another. Whether it’s to cut through a bit of string, tighten a screw or simply to solve the problem of no bottle opener in the […]Read more
Supply chain risk is an area of cyber security that demands the ongoing attention of every enterprise; because it can make the difference between being resilient or not. It’s no surprise that insurers warn that the vulnerability of supply chains is potentially a systemic risk that can quickly propagate across supply chain dominated industries. Organisations […]Read more
It took a “tripartite cyber assessment” by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) to identify that a sample of financial organisations had inadequate cyber security: poor security control management, a lack of business recovery planning and inadequate 3rd party risk assessment. Why were there gaps? Where is the failure? Clearly the common practice of unsubstantiated […]Read more
The discussion over data-driven vs qualitative cyber security assessment has been going for some time. Nowadays, it is at the top of the priority list for many security and senior executive teams. Managing cyber security has always been a noble ambition but without reliable measurement, the lack of actionable information makes evidence-based management decisions almost […]Read more
Attack Surface Management (ASM) characterises a business’s security risks as the monitoring and risk mitigation of a constantly changing and vulnerable “risk-surface”. Importantly, this attack surface extends to both internal and external assets and services. Some ASM solutions deliver clear visibility across both Internet facing and internal assets. Others do not. Instead, they assess external […]Read more
The UK Government has released its annual “Cyber Security Breaches Survey 2023”. It provides some valuable insights into how cyber security is currently being managed in the UK, by a range of organisations. It also speaks to how current competing economic priorities are impacting the effectiveness of some cyber security management efforts. The full report […]Read more
Solving the mismatch between cyber security reporting and directors’ requirements You are undoubtedly familiar with the headlines; you may have even become in part desensitised to them: ‘Cyber-attacks are increasingly damaging’, or ‘large amounts of personal data are most at risk’. The important take-away, however, is that modern day thieves can easily gain access to […]Read more
A system to address the untrustworthy security environment Zero trust approaches to security have been talked about for a while; but in recent times they have certainly gained more currency. As a model for protecting data and services, the simplicity of the concept is its biggest strength – assume, as a default position, there is […]Read more
The ongoing protection of Critical Infrastructure from cyber-attacks has implications for us all – whether it’s supporting our health, well-being or simply our way of life, there is good reason to reflect on the effectiveness your cyber security. Cyber security risks are nothing new and the vulnerability of critical infrastructure to them (and the heightened […]Read more
Read by directors, executives, and security professionals globally, operating in the most complex of security environments.