Our cyber security products span from our next gen SIEM used in the most secure government and critical infrastructure environments, to automated cyber risk reporting applications for commercial and government organisations of all sizes.
Cyber maturity assessments provide vital insights into an organisation’s ability to protect its information assets and defend itself against cyber threats. However, they are time consuming, labour intensive and often difficult to execute – particularly when most staff are working from home and site visits are restricted. This blog post explores the elements of the process that present the biggest challenges and how security audit technology can help you overcome them.
A full cyber maturity assessment involves a security audit, a comprehensive review of people, processes, technology and culture – a deep dive into how an organisation operates in its endeavours for cyber resilience. This includes interviews, questionnaires and a reliance on face-to-face time with staff on the ground. The security audit process itself involves a number of key stages:
The Audit process
In ‘normal’ operating times this is standard operating procedure, but here and now in 2020, how do you manage the technical elements of an assessment, the data collection and evidence gathering and collation of information for analysis and interpretation and then report writing. This is hard if you have one environment, but if you have multiple business units or clients to service then it becomes a logistical nightmare.
Using internal security audit technology that can systematically gather data from across the organisation provides you with the ability to either manage the data collection and evidence gathering stage of the audit process without attending a site, or manage the process on site without relying on expert staff; the outputs can then be gathered for central (or remote) analysis.
This works perfectly for large diverse networks, for any situation where there are scarce expert resources, and for all situations where there are a large number of audit targets – be that suppliers or business units. Separating the data gathering from the interpretation is a logical division of labour and expertise, especially if people are in different locations.
Internal security audit technology supports meaningful analysis and interpretation of data; collecting data in an automated way means that a whole environment can be used making the data comprehensive and representative. Where an auditor might inspect a subset/sample of systems and extrapolate the findings, a software tool can gather control metrics from the management systems and audit targets in their entirety.
Security audit technology also avoids subjectivity. In manual audits data subjects are often chosen (or excluded) to meet the needs or the assessor, for example, reporting on platforms that are known to be well maintained. An audit tool will look at all areas – good, bad or otherwise.
Essential 8 Auditor – Application Control Maturity Dashboard
The challenges in conducting cyber maturity assessments persist, whether it’s conducting a review of your own business or your client’s portfolio of business units.
By streamlining the most cumbersome elements of the security audit process, you can free up your time to focus on remediation activity and development of a road map for improving cyber maturity. Security audit technology can help with your cyber maturity assessments today. However, they can also be part of your improvement plan that involves checking progress next year, next quarter or continuously.
<<< Part 2a: Australia’s Essential Eight: Beyond Endpoint Control <<< Part 2b: Activating UK NCSC & US NIST Guidelines: Beyond Endpoint Control Part 4: Systematic Measurement of Cyber Controls >>> As much as we invest into cyber security controls, external threats are inevitable. In a recent Notifiable Data Breaches Report from the Office of the […]Read more
Keen campers, scouts and even the Swiss Army know – that a good penknife is indispensable. This simple device has mitigated many a disaster at one point in time or another. Whether it’s to cut through a bit of string, tighten a screw or simply to solve the problem of no bottle opener in the […]Read more
Supply chain risk is an area of cyber security that demands the ongoing attention of every enterprise; because it can make the difference between being resilient or not. It’s no surprise that insurers warn that the vulnerability of supply chains is potentially a systemic risk that can quickly propagate across supply chain dominated industries. Organisations […]Read more
It took a “tripartite cyber assessment” by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) to identify that a sample of financial organisations had inadequate cyber security: poor security control management, a lack of business recovery planning and inadequate 3rd party risk assessment. Why were there gaps? Where is the failure? Clearly the common practice of unsubstantiated […]Read more
The discussion over data-driven vs qualitative cyber security assessment has been going for some time. Nowadays, it is at the top of the priority list for many security and senior executive teams. Managing cyber security has always been a noble ambition but without reliable measurement, the lack of actionable information makes evidence-based management decisions almost […]Read more
Attack Surface Management (ASM) characterises a business’s security risks as the monitoring and risk mitigation of a constantly changing and vulnerable “risk-surface”. Importantly, this attack surface extends to both internal and external assets and services. Some ASM solutions deliver clear visibility across both Internet facing and internal assets. Others do not. Instead, they assess external […]Read more
The UK Government has released its annual “Cyber Security Breaches Survey 2023”. It provides some valuable insights into how cyber security is currently being managed in the UK, by a range of organisations. It also speaks to how current competing economic priorities are impacting the effectiveness of some cyber security management efforts. The full report […]Read more
Solving the mismatch between cyber security reporting and directors’ requirements You are undoubtedly familiar with the headlines; you may have even become in part desensitised to them: ‘Cyber-attacks are increasingly damaging’, or ‘large amounts of personal data are most at risk’. The important take-away, however, is that modern day thieves can easily gain access to […]Read more
A system to address the untrustworthy security environment Zero trust approaches to security have been talked about for a while; but in recent times they have certainly gained more currency. As a model for protecting data and services, the simplicity of the concept is its biggest strength – assume, as a default position, there is […]Read more
The ongoing protection of Critical Infrastructure from cyber-attacks has implications for us all – whether it’s supporting our health, well-being or simply our way of life, there is good reason to reflect on the effectiveness your cyber security. Cyber security risks are nothing new and the vulnerability of critical infrastructure to them (and the heightened […]Read more
Read by directors, executives, and security professionals globally, operating in the most complex of security environments.