Our cyber security products span from our next gen SIEM used in the most secure government and critical infrastructure environments, to automated cyber risk reporting applications for commercial and government organisations of all sizes.
Whether as a result of increased governance at Board level or simply improved performance management practice, cyber risk measurement and management is now acknowledged as an important 360-degree risk mitigation strategy to support your corporate risk management responsibilities.
To address the existential cyber risks your organisation faces you need to improve the quality, reliability and accessibility of your cyber reporting.
The interdependency of IT systems highlights the increasing need for organisations to better understand the state of their security defences; and those of their partners. Published cyber risk ratings or a cyber security score can benefit of all stakeholders – investors, shareholders, partners and commercial counterparties – by providing a relative measure of the state of cyber posture for the organisation.
A poor cyber score alerts us to a vulnerability within an organisation, which could result in major commercial costs for all connected parties. It is increasingly important to know the cyber risk status of those you deal with. Look no further than the widespread supply chain issues caused by Spanish online survey company Typeform’s data breach back in June 2018.
Effective cyber risk measurement communicates important risk information that is clear, simple and timely for management and decision making purposes for both cyber security and management stakeholders.
The ability to measure a common set of key cyber performance indicators (KPIs) enables organisations to undertake appropriate due diligence and supports security staff in the pre-emptive mitigation of any identified risks; improving the overall cyber posture of their eco-system or supply chain in the process.
A recent Gartner report has gone so far as to suggest that by 2022 “a trust index” or security ratings will be as important as credit ratings in the risk assessment of existing or new business relationships. See “Innovation Insight for Security Rating Services”, a report published on July 27, 2018 by Gartner.
There are a number of cyber security scorecard solutions available in the market that provide an assessment of an organisation’s security posture or cyber risk rating.
As you would reasonably expect, the more objective and systematic the “measurement” process the more reliable the risk rating; the subjective nature of self-assessment and data sampling has been shown to be overly optimistic in its measurement of cyber posture (ANAO Essential Eight Compliance Report No 53, 2017-18, June 2018).
A security scorecard should incorporate established, systematic methodology at its core, using a common language to communicate risk. Frameworks such as Australia’s ACSC Essential Eight, the UK’s NCSC Top 10 and United States’ NIST all provide comprehensive, tested strategies for mitigating risk and measurement.
How is the security rating of your organisation determined?
The essence of a sound security rating is that it is a verifiable measure that can be relied upon for performance management and informed decision making. Anything less is not fit for purpose.
The volatile nature of the cyber security landscape means that security ratings are far more dynamic than, for example, financial sector ratings; as a result, the security status of an organisation can change very quickly. Therefore, the more current and relevant the measurement the more accurate the cyber ratings.
There is little doubt qualitative metrics have value, the fact that a sensitive document was found on the dark web is certainly a cause for concern for any executive team. The next important step, however, is to determine the nature and extent of the potential risks that led to that event. Like every aspect of cyber security, attribution is vital, but when subjectivity and qualitative assessment become part of the scientific security management process, measurement based diagnostics are compromised.
Many organisations, because of concerns being raised by stakeholders, are turning to their own audit methods and quantitative techniques to accurately assess risk and report their cyber posture. These efforts bring reliability, confidence and currency to the measurement but are time-consuming, disruptive and extremely costly.
Huntsman Security has developed its Essential 8 Security Scorecard to measure the state of defences and controls against the Australian government’s published ACSC Essential 8 framework; metrics are drawn from the systematic, ongoing monitoring of key cyber security controls.
The Essential 8 Security Scorecard delivers a number of important benefits:
Qualitative and arbitrary risks assessments can certainly paint a picture but, without an empirical basis, they can easily compromise the decision making of risk managers and executives when responding to emerging risks. This can come at a very high price to organisations.
The Essential 8 Security Scorecard is a cyber risk management tool that simply and clearly informs on your growing corporate cyber security resilience for better business management outcomes.
<<< Part 2a: Australia’s Essential Eight: Beyond Endpoint Control <<< Part 2b: Activating UK NCSC & US NIST Guidelines: Beyond Endpoint Control Part 4: Systematic Measurement of Cyber Controls >>> As much as we invest into cyber security controls, external threats are inevitable. In a recent Notifiable Data Breaches Report from the Office of the […]Read more
Keen campers, scouts and even the Swiss Army know – that a good penknife is indispensable. This simple device has mitigated many a disaster at one point in time or another. Whether it’s to cut through a bit of string, tighten a screw or simply to solve the problem of no bottle opener in the […]Read more
Supply chain risk is an area of cyber security that demands the ongoing attention of every enterprise; because it can make the difference between being resilient or not. It’s no surprise that insurers warn that the vulnerability of supply chains is potentially a systemic risk that can quickly propagate across supply chain dominated industries. Organisations […]Read more
It took a “tripartite cyber assessment” by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) to identify that a sample of financial organisations had inadequate cyber security: poor security control management, a lack of business recovery planning and inadequate 3rd party risk assessment. Why were there gaps? Where is the failure? Clearly the common practice of unsubstantiated […]Read more
The discussion over data-driven vs qualitative cyber security assessment has been going for some time. Nowadays, it is at the top of the priority list for many security and senior executive teams. Managing cyber security has always been a noble ambition but without reliable measurement, the lack of actionable information makes evidence-based management decisions almost […]Read more
Attack Surface Management (ASM) characterises a business’s security risks as the monitoring and risk mitigation of a constantly changing and vulnerable “risk-surface”. Importantly, this attack surface extends to both internal and external assets and services. Some ASM solutions deliver clear visibility across both Internet facing and internal assets. Others do not. Instead, they assess external […]Read more
The UK Government has released its annual “Cyber Security Breaches Survey 2023”. It provides some valuable insights into how cyber security is currently being managed in the UK, by a range of organisations. It also speaks to how current competing economic priorities are impacting the effectiveness of some cyber security management efforts. The full report […]Read more
Solving the mismatch between cyber security reporting and directors’ requirements You are undoubtedly familiar with the headlines; you may have even become in part desensitised to them: ‘Cyber-attacks are increasingly damaging’, or ‘large amounts of personal data are most at risk’. The important take-away, however, is that modern day thieves can easily gain access to […]Read more
A system to address the untrustworthy security environment Zero trust approaches to security have been talked about for a while; but in recent times they have certainly gained more currency. As a model for protecting data and services, the simplicity of the concept is its biggest strength – assume, as a default position, there is […]Read more
The ongoing protection of Critical Infrastructure from cyber-attacks has implications for us all – whether it’s supporting our health, well-being or simply our way of life, there is good reason to reflect on the effectiveness your cyber security. Cyber security risks are nothing new and the vulnerability of critical infrastructure to them (and the heightened […]Read more
Read by directors, executives, and security professionals globally, operating in the most complex of security environments.