Our cyber security products span from our next gen SIEM used in the most secure government and critical infrastructure environments, to automated cyber risk reporting applications for commercial and government organisations of all sizes.
Whether as a result of increased governance at Board level or simply improved performance management practice, cyber risk measurement and management is now acknowledged as an important 360-degree risk mitigation strategy to support your corporate risk management responsibilities.
To address the existential cyber risks your organisation faces you need to improve the quality, reliability and accessibility of your cyber reporting.
The interdependency of IT systems highlights the increasing need for organisations to better understand the state of their security defences; and those of their partners. Published cyber risk ratings or a cyber security score can benefit of all stakeholders – investors, shareholders, partners and commercial counterparties – by providing a relative measure of the state of cyber posture for the organisation.
A poor cyber score alerts us to a vulnerability within an organisation, which could result in major commercial costs for all connected parties. It is increasingly important to know the cyber risk status of those you deal with. Look no further than the widespread supply chain issues caused by Spanish online survey company Typeform’s data breach back in June 2018.
Effective cyber risk measurement communicates important risk information that is clear, simple and timely for management and decision making purposes for both cyber security and management stakeholders.
The ability to measure a common set of key cyber performance indicators (KPIs) enables organisations to undertake appropriate due diligence and supports security staff in the pre-emptive mitigation of any identified risks; improving the overall cyber posture of their eco-system or supply chain in the process.
A recent Gartner report has gone so far as to suggest that by 2022 “a trust index” or security ratings will be as important as credit ratings in the risk assessment of existing or new business relationships. See “Innovation Insight for Security Rating Services”, a report published on July 27, 2018 by Gartner.
There are a number of cyber security scorecard solutions available in the market that provide an assessment of an organisation’s security posture or cyber risk rating.
As you would reasonably expect, the more objective and systematic the “measurement” process the more reliable the risk rating; the subjective nature of self-assessment and data sampling has been shown to be overly optimistic in its measurement of cyber posture (ANAO Essential Eight Compliance Report No 53, 2017-18, June 2018).
A security scorecard should incorporate established, systematic methodology at its core, using a common language to communicate risk. Frameworks such as Australia’s ACSC Essential Eight, the UK’s NCSC Top 10 and United States’ NIST all provide comprehensive, tested strategies for mitigating risk and measurement.
How is the security rating of your organisation determined?
The essence of a sound security rating is that it is a verifiable measure that can be relied upon for performance management and informed decision making. Anything less is not fit for purpose.
The volatile nature of the cyber security landscape means that security ratings are far more dynamic than, for example, financial sector ratings; as a result, the security status of an organisation can change very quickly. Therefore, the more current and relevant the measurement the more accurate the cyber ratings.
There is little doubt qualitative metrics have value, the fact that a sensitive document was found on the dark web is certainly a cause for concern for any executive team. The next important step, however, is to determine the nature and extent of the potential risks that led to that event. Like every aspect of cyber security, attribution is vital, but when subjectivity and qualitative assessment become part of the scientific security management process, measurement based diagnostics are compromised.
Many organisations, because of concerns being raised by stakeholders, are turning to their own audit methods and quantitative techniques to accurately assess risk and report their cyber posture. These efforts bring reliability, confidence and currency to the measurement but are time-consuming, disruptive and extremely costly.
Huntsman Security has developed its Essential 8 Security Scorecard to measure the state of defences and controls against the Australian government’s published ACSC Essential 8 framework; metrics are drawn from the systematic, ongoing monitoring of key cyber security controls.
The Essential 8 Security Scorecard delivers a number of important benefits:
Qualitative and arbitrary risks assessments can certainly paint a picture but, without an empirical basis, they can easily compromise the decision making of risk managers and executives when responding to emerging risks. This can come at a very high price to organisations.
The Essential 8 Security Scorecard is a cyber risk management tool that simply and clearly informs on your growing corporate cyber security resilience for better business management outcomes.
A recent KPMG Report suggests that protecting against and dealing with cyber risks will be the major challenge for senior executives in 2024. It is clear that despite high levels of security investment, organisations continue to suffer from cyber attacks.Read more
The Australian Signals Directorate’s (ASD) recent publication of their Cyber Threat Report 2022-2023 unearthed a range of areas for concern for government departments and critical infrastructure entities at local, State and Federal level.Read more
As cyber risks increase, organisations are encountering the longer life cycle of insurance renewals and the need to demonstrate better management of security controls and their effectiveness.Read more
Highlights and insights from the recent Managed Services Summit in London & the ISACA Central Chapter Conference on Digital Trust, in Birmingham, UK. With two recent conferences in the space of three days, some interesting challenges were very evident in the topics discussed. Being very different events, the challenges were quite different, but interestingly they […]Read more
In early August 2023, the latest joint advisory on persistent vulnerabilities was issued by the intelligence and security agencies of the “Five-eyes” community. These joint advisories are becoming more common. Perhaps recognising the growing importance of shared security information and the common nature of many of the threats faced – the weight they carry makes […]Read more
The quality of your risk assessment and the security information it provides is important; if you plan to use it to actively manage your operational and cyber resilience activities. Organisations are constantly exposed to a rapidly changing threat environment, so you really need a similarly rapid evidence-based feedback system that informs you of the ongoing […]Read more
The UK market has its own regulators, security standards and challenges. And while rulings from SEC in the US or the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) in Australia don’t apply to UK companies, for the most part, the observations are undoubtedly relevant and the resulting advice instructive. It would be wrong to think UK financial […]Read more
<<< Part 2a: Australia’s Essential Eight: Beyond Endpoint Control <<< Part 2b: Activating UK NCSC & US NIST Guidelines: Beyond Endpoint Control Part 4: Systematic Measurement of Cyber Controls >>> As much as we invest into cyber security controls, external threats are inevitable. In a recent Notifiable Data Breaches Report from the Office of the […]Read more
Keen campers, scouts and even the Swiss Army know – that a good penknife is indispensable. This simple device has mitigated many a disaster at one point in time or another. Whether it’s to cut through a bit of string, tighten a screw or simply to solve the problem of no bottle opener in the […]Read more
Supply chain risk is an area of cyber security that demands the ongoing attention of every enterprise; because it can make the difference between being resilient or not. It’s no surprise that insurers warn that the vulnerability of supply chains is potentially a systemic risk that can quickly propagate across supply chain dominated industries. Organisations […]Read more
Read by directors, executives, and security professionals globally, operating in the most complex of security environments.