Our cyber security products span from our next gen SIEM used in the most secure government and critical infrastructure environments, to automated cyber risk reporting applications for commercial and government organisations of all sizes.
The importance of accurately identifying and communicating a business’s risk exposure has never been more critical. This is particularly true for audit and security managers who undertake cyber security audits.
In this blog post we look at the key factors affecting cyber security audits including audit accuracy, sampling and coverage, timeliness, resources and costs. We then go on to provide some insights into how technology can help with the digital transformation of the process.
There has been a huge rise in the pressures being applied to business by laws and regulation, such as the privacy requirements of GDPR. These pressures affect not just IT and technical areas, and the volume of work they need to deal with – they impose responsibility to consider cyber security in marketing, operations, HR, finance and audit and compliance functions that are now such a critical part of corporate governance. It is now vital that a wide range of stakeholders are well informed about the organisation’s security posture and any potential or actual breaches.
As workloads expand and the timeliness of assessments come under growing pressure from mandatory requirements placed on businesses, resources are often stretched to breaking point. This has an effect on staff welfare, can become a compliance issue and a massive risk exposure.
Across all aspects of business, digital transformation is a guiding strategy to reduce the amount of human intervention in repetitive or laborious processes and streamline workflows so that the majority of transactions or cases are automatic or customer-driven. The goal is to enable managers or operators to get involved only for oversight or to handle specific instances – to receive the outputs from processes that are reliably and algorithmically defined, rather than having to manually drive them.
Traditional audit processes utilise sampling. This works well when you are trying to identify errors or faults in controls or processes. You can take a set of representative examples, check them and then extrapolate the likely error rate or likelihood of failures. In cyber security, however, the error condition is often a deliberate or forced act.
Cyber security risks often have their root causes in oversights, mistakes or human failings; and they are then often exploited or manifest deliberately as an attacker looks for a vulnerability or an open door. So, the omission of just one failure from a sample may specifically be the target of an initial attack – a sample will be “choosing x from y” whereas an attacker will check “all of y” for a weakness. Using audit sampling methodology leaves the cyber risk door wide open.
Many organisation’s undertake audit checks once per year – it’s a big investment in time and resources. Given the dynamic nature of a cyber security environment the reality is that an organisation’s security posture can be perfectly fine one day but compromised the next.
Many cyber attacks take seconds to mount, coupled with the fact that many defensive processes like security configurations, patching, backups and group memberships are continuous in nature. It is not only possible, but highly likely that an environment will, over time, “drift” away from a secure state. This means that annual/quarterly audits or health-checks may well be too infrequent to provide an accurate view of risk exposure or assurance.
Also, infrequent or annual audits can be “prepared for” – with a spring cleaning exercise often preceding them; thereby obfuscating a “true” view of risk exposure. How can audit and risk managers execute audits more frequently and cost effectively?
There is no doubt that machine generated workloads require machine generated processing – no matter what industry you look at. In the world of cyber risk auditing, a manual response to regulatory requirements such as ‘regular’ and ‘ongoing’ audits cannot be met without tools; the digital transformation of compliance and cyber resilience needs to maximise coverage and scope so that obscure or hidden cyber vulnerabilities are not missed, masked or simply not included in a chosen sample.
The emergence of audit tools, that have the ability to support regular audit cycles by gathering data and generating reports with minimal human intervention, is more important than ever. This provides assurance to stakeholders and supports the fulfilment of regulatory requirements. Automated approaches are more efficient than manual ones. They are less prone to subjectivity, reporting bias and fallibility.
No matter what regulation, standard or framework you are auditing against, there is a common set of security controls that you need to check are in place and operating effectively. These generally include: application whitelisting, application patching, operating system patching, restricting administrative privileges, multi-factor authentication, user application hardening and taking daily back-ups. The image below shows an example of the valuable information our Essential 8 Auditor product can communicate regarding the effectiveness and maturity of the application whitelisting security control.
Essential 8 Auditor – Application Whitelisting Security Control Summary
The Essential 8 Auditor delivers an immediate view of an organisation’s cyber posture against 8 fundamental security controls, recognised by Australian Government as the ‘Essential Eight‘. The solution automatically gathers data from ongoing security operations and through direct connections to systems and configuration interfaces to determine coverage, identify weak points and policy failures against each of the controls.
You can read more regarding the Essential 8 Auditor on the web page: https://www.huntsmansecurity.com/products/essential-8-auditor/
A recent KPMG Report suggests that protecting against and dealing with cyber risks will be the major challenge for senior executives in 2024. It is clear that despite high levels of security investment, organisations continue to suffer from cyber attacks.Read more
The Australian Signals Directorate’s (ASD) recent publication of their Cyber Threat Report 2022-2023 unearthed a range of areas for concern for government departments and critical infrastructure entities at local, State and Federal level.Read more
As cyber risks increase, organisations are encountering the longer life cycle of insurance renewals and the need to demonstrate better management of security controls and their effectiveness.Read more
Highlights and insights from the recent Managed Services Summit in London & the ISACA Central Chapter Conference on Digital Trust, in Birmingham, UK. With two recent conferences in the space of three days, some interesting challenges were very evident in the topics discussed. Being very different events, the challenges were quite different, but interestingly they […]Read more
In early August 2023, the latest joint advisory on persistent vulnerabilities was issued by the intelligence and security agencies of the “Five-eyes” community. These joint advisories are becoming more common. Perhaps recognising the growing importance of shared security information and the common nature of many of the threats faced – the weight they carry makes […]Read more
The quality of your risk assessment and the security information it provides is important; if you plan to use it to actively manage your operational and cyber resilience activities. Organisations are constantly exposed to a rapidly changing threat environment, so you really need a similarly rapid evidence-based feedback system that informs you of the ongoing […]Read more
The UK market has its own regulators, security standards and challenges. And while rulings from SEC in the US or the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) in Australia don’t apply to UK companies, for the most part, the observations are undoubtedly relevant and the resulting advice instructive. It would be wrong to think UK financial […]Read more
<<< Part 2a: Australia’s Essential Eight: Beyond Endpoint Control <<< Part 2b: Activating UK NCSC & US NIST Guidelines: Beyond Endpoint Control Part 4: Systematic Measurement of Cyber Controls >>> As much as we invest into cyber security controls, external threats are inevitable. In a recent Notifiable Data Breaches Report from the Office of the […]Read more
Keen campers, scouts and even the Swiss Army know – that a good penknife is indispensable. This simple device has mitigated many a disaster at one point in time or another. Whether it’s to cut through a bit of string, tighten a screw or simply to solve the problem of no bottle opener in the […]Read more
Supply chain risk is an area of cyber security that demands the ongoing attention of every enterprise; because it can make the difference between being resilient or not. It’s no surprise that insurers warn that the vulnerability of supply chains is potentially a systemic risk that can quickly propagate across supply chain dominated industries. Organisations […]Read more
Read by directors, executives, and security professionals globally, operating in the most complex of security environments.