Our cyber security products span from our next gen SIEM used in the most secure government and critical infrastructure environments, to automated cyber risk reporting applications for commercial and government organisations of all sizes.
To ensure threat data is processed into cyber security threat intelligence quickly, analysts rely on their technologies to verify and contextualise it.
One of the greatest weapons cyber security operations teams have for fending off cyberattacks is high-quality, verifiable and actionable cyber security threat intelligence. But beware, labelling raw operational data as intelligence is overvaluing its importance. Customers will quickly learn that much of this “Threat Intelligence” is little more than a stream of IP addresses, URLs, hashes and signatures; and all you can do with it is a basic block or search.
To realise any value from threat data, it needs to be processed, verified and contextualised so that the business can trust it and act upon it. Ingesting threat data into your security technologies, such as firewalls, IPSs and SIEMs, can allow you to counter a variety of attacks, but only if that information has relevance to your business, so the protection it offers is specific not just generic.
Military and national security doctrine has documented the intelligence process for hundreds of years. Intelligence analysis and production has been refined over centuries of warfare and espionage, with the difference between data, information and intelligence well defined.
The intelligence process takes operational data through several stages of maturation, from individual data fragments through to contextual, actionable intelligence products, verified by multiple sources. Furthermore, the process shown in Figure 1 transforms the data through three clear stages: the data is first processed into information then, through analysis and production, it gets published as intelligence. Finally, the system allows for feedback which informs the analyst whether the sources were good enough to allow them to meet their end goals.
Figure 1 Taken from Joint Publication 2-0 U.S. Dept. of the Army
Intelligence analysts assess operational data against command objectives (their business requirements) all day long, verifying it against multiple disparate sources to authenticate and validate it. Critical intelligence products are weighted by their significance to the requirements: attributing value, reliability and context. Only then is the intelligence product published and only then can it be acted upon. But how does this apply to cyber security and SOC operations?
There is no shortage of Open Source threat information available on the Internet. You can subscribe to aggregated feeds, such as Hail a Taxii, which offer a stream of, “Open Source Cyber Threat Intelligence” in a format that SIEM technologies can ingest (known as STIX). The traditional intelligence model (Figure 1) suggests that this data is the input to the first stage of the process, but it still needs to be analysed, processed, validated and contextualised to be relevant to your situation.
The main problem with cyber security is that the time between a threat emerging and the operational team acting to protect the business needs to be as short as possible. Processing, validating and contextualising the data flowing in from threat feeds, such as Hail a Taxii, takes time but to capture an attack it needs to be fast. Rapid threat containment is crucial.
To ensure threat data is processed into intelligence quickly, analysts rely on their technologies to verify and contextualise it. The technology needs business context and must have the smarts to validate what it’s seeing across multiple sources; preferably automatically, and at machine speeds. For example, when we get to the stage when technology determines an IP address found on a threat feed matched one from a web gateway’s log, and it initiates an automatic block in the firewall, we have succeeded, right? When the raw data is automatically taken through the intelligence process, resulting in a context-relevant action, then we can claim we are following the true intelligence process. In some cases, this is possible today, but there is still some ways to go before it’s working at all levels of operational, tactical and strategic analysis.
Many intelligence capabilities are already possible, if your analysts know how to use all the features of your technology. Huntsman Security’s Next Gen SIEM SOAR can perform a variety of enrichment services including automatic threat verification and signalling of external technologies to automatically act on a threat.
As an industry, we are going through a scientific revolution, finally building in artificial intelligence, machine learning and behavioural analyses into our products, allowing us to finally get close to keeping up with the criminals. But collaboration is required to reach the goal, where threat feeds are only a small part of the intelligence puzzle. We need a variety of intelligence feeds, sourced and processed by analysts who can build operational, tactical and strategic intelligence outcomes for our businesses. Only then can we claim that we do Intelligence properly.
The UK market has its own regulators, security standards and challenges. And while rulings from SEC in the US or the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) in Australia don’t apply to UK companies, for the most part, the observations are undoubtedly relevant and the resulting advice instructive. It would be wrong to think UK financial […]Read more
<<< Part 2a: Australia’s Essential Eight: Beyond Endpoint Control <<< Part 2b: Activating UK NCSC & US NIST Guidelines: Beyond Endpoint Control Part 4: Systematic Measurement of Cyber Controls >>> As much as we invest into cyber security controls, external threats are inevitable. In a recent Notifiable Data Breaches Report from the Office of the […]Read more
Keen campers, scouts and even the Swiss Army know – that a good penknife is indispensable. This simple device has mitigated many a disaster at one point in time or another. Whether it’s to cut through a bit of string, tighten a screw or simply to solve the problem of no bottle opener in the […]Read more
Supply chain risk is an area of cyber security that demands the ongoing attention of every enterprise; because it can make the difference between being resilient or not. It’s no surprise that insurers warn that the vulnerability of supply chains is potentially a systemic risk that can quickly propagate across supply chain dominated industries. Organisations […]Read more
It took a “tripartite cyber assessment” by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) to identify that a sample of financial organisations had inadequate cyber security: poor security control management, a lack of business recovery planning and inadequate 3rd party risk assessment. Why were there gaps? Where is the failure? Clearly the common practice of unsubstantiated […]Read more
The discussion over data-driven vs qualitative cyber security assessment has been going for some time. Nowadays, it is at the top of the priority list for many security and senior executive teams. Managing cyber security has always been a noble ambition but without reliable measurement, the lack of actionable information makes evidence-based management decisions almost […]Read more
Attack Surface Management (ASM) characterises a business’s security risks as the monitoring and risk mitigation of a constantly changing and vulnerable “risk-surface”. Importantly, this attack surface extends to both internal and external assets and services. Some ASM solutions deliver clear visibility across both Internet facing and internal assets. Others do not. Instead, they assess external […]Read more
The UK Government has released its annual “Cyber Security Breaches Survey 2023”. It provides some valuable insights into how cyber security is currently being managed in the UK, by a range of organisations. It also speaks to how current competing economic priorities are impacting the effectiveness of some cyber security management efforts. The full report […]Read more
Solving the mismatch between cyber security reporting and directors’ requirements You are undoubtedly familiar with the headlines; you may have even become in part desensitised to them: ‘Cyber-attacks are increasingly damaging’, or ‘large amounts of personal data are most at risk’. The important take-away, however, is that modern day thieves can easily gain access to […]Read more
A system to address the untrustworthy security environment Zero trust approaches to security have been talked about for a while; but in recent times they have certainly gained more currency. As a model for protecting data and services, the simplicity of the concept is its biggest strength – assume, as a default position, there is […]Read more
Read by directors, executives, and security professionals globally, operating in the most complex of security environments.