Our cyber security products span from our next gen SIEM used in the most secure government and critical infrastructure environments, to automated cyber risk reporting applications for commercial and government organisations of all sizes.
The pandemic is currently ravaging people’s lives and the economy across the world. Cyber security and audit professionals, and their roles, included.
Businesses are walking a narrower financial tightrope than ever before, balancing cost cutting, with human resources, lost business and diminished profits.
In the midst of all the disruption, businesses still have regulatory obligations and governance responsibilities to fulfil, including effective financial and business reporting and the audit processes and lines of defence that ensure these are correctly derived and reported.
Businesses are the custodians of significant amounts of their own intellectual property and customer data which needs to be protected. It would be terrible to narrowly survive the pandemic only to suffer a huge data loss or serious breach of data quality.
And of course, the legal and regulatory requirements under regulations like GDPR or NISD still apply. A business that was affected due to mandated home working or lapses in on site security operations might be given more lenient treatment at some future point by a regulator, but those legal obligations still persist, and people still expect their data to be held safely.
So cyber security matters, and the associated validation, audit and assurance processes around it matter too.
The restrictions on business operations and travel have had some effects on how these assurance and assessment activities are being carried out. Some with possibly longer-term ramifications for how businesses gain a view into their security operations metrics and performance indicators.
In some cases, there will be a pause to proceedings, a delay of perhaps 6-12 weeks depending on the location and proximity of staff or length of lock down rules being in effect. In the worst case that means that the normal audit calendar of activities is going to have to be condensed into ¾ of the time it normally would be.
Some of the highly important activities, such as financial audits that culminate in annual reports, might be hard to condense or shorten so other areas may have to be squeezed.
This means that ways of working that save time are going to be paramount. Anything that can reduce the time and resource needed for field work or reporting, or that can cut the logistical overhead of travel, site visits or data analysis will be a useful addition to the audit team’s toolset.
We’ve seen this specifically in the demand for Huntsman Security’s Auditor tool. The software can be sent as an installer to a site that requires auditing, have the data gathered by a local administrator (who can themselves be working remotely from home), and the results then be quickly analysed centrally within, or by, the audit team. This reduction in time spent on visits and data collection can make a big difference to getting control assurance activities done when the elapsed time is under pressure.
Some activities that require face-to-face contact, or where site visits or direct interaction are necessary might not be possible at all during the pandemic lockdown, so they will have to be deferred to later in the year when they are possible. Clearly, to avoid compromising the audit work programme, it’s important to identify what activities were planned outside the lockdown period that could be swapped around to ensure that time pressures don’t hit too hard when travel and access is eased.
Maybe you can’t audit process A, but you can audit process B. So instead of doing A in May and B in September as you planned; do the audit for B down under lockdown so that auditing A can take place more easily later in the year.
The task here is to identify what audit work can be undertaken, and rescheduling it into the lockdown period. As we’ve seen above, in some cases there may be technology solutions that mean you can do audit B in a different way that means it can be undertaken now.
Cyber security reviews and audits, like many others, often involve a degree of physical contact, dialogue and site visits. When you can’t travel to sites this cannot happen. Interviews can be undertaken by video conference and documentation and records can be emailed, but it is hard to directly assess security controls and system configurations for afar.
However, if we are looking at technical controls (aside from say awareness processes and incident response plans) then there are ways to gather this control data and evidence and to analyse and report on the level of control maturity and assurance remotely.
Varying levels of automation are possible here, depending on what remote access is feasible, but if you have a consistent tool that you can send to each end point, site or audit domain and collect the data consistently; back at base (or more likely in the home office of the auditor) you can analyse this remotely collected – but trustworthy – data and generate the same kind of audit reports for management and stakeholders.
If these processes, that are so key to control assurance and system integrity, can be achieved remotely and more quickly, then not only can audit activities and assurance prevail over the virus restrictions, but the work that is undertaken now can make way for other programmes of work when travel once again becomes possible and people are back in offices.
These new efficiencies in approach can persist beyond the Coronavirus pandemic and become part of a streamlined and more optimised audit programme in future years.
For more information on Huntsman Security’s products that are in use within our customers to undertake cyber security audit processes see the resource page here.
The UK market has its own regulators, security standards and challenges. And while rulings from SEC in the US or the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) in Australia don’t apply to UK companies, for the most part, the observations are undoubtedly relevant and the resulting advice instructive. It would be wrong to think UK financial […]Read more
<<< Part 2a: Australia’s Essential Eight: Beyond Endpoint Control <<< Part 2b: Activating UK NCSC & US NIST Guidelines: Beyond Endpoint Control Part 4: Systematic Measurement of Cyber Controls >>> As much as we invest into cyber security controls, external threats are inevitable. In a recent Notifiable Data Breaches Report from the Office of the […]Read more
Keen campers, scouts and even the Swiss Army know – that a good penknife is indispensable. This simple device has mitigated many a disaster at one point in time or another. Whether it’s to cut through a bit of string, tighten a screw or simply to solve the problem of no bottle opener in the […]Read more
Supply chain risk is an area of cyber security that demands the ongoing attention of every enterprise; because it can make the difference between being resilient or not. It’s no surprise that insurers warn that the vulnerability of supply chains is potentially a systemic risk that can quickly propagate across supply chain dominated industries. Organisations […]Read more
It took a “tripartite cyber assessment” by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) to identify that a sample of financial organisations had inadequate cyber security: poor security control management, a lack of business recovery planning and inadequate 3rd party risk assessment. Why were there gaps? Where is the failure? Clearly the common practice of unsubstantiated […]Read more
The discussion over data-driven vs qualitative cyber security assessment has been going for some time. Nowadays, it is at the top of the priority list for many security and senior executive teams. Managing cyber security has always been a noble ambition but without reliable measurement, the lack of actionable information makes evidence-based management decisions almost […]Read more
Attack Surface Management (ASM) characterises a business’s security risks as the monitoring and risk mitigation of a constantly changing and vulnerable “risk-surface”. Importantly, this attack surface extends to both internal and external assets and services. Some ASM solutions deliver clear visibility across both Internet facing and internal assets. Others do not. Instead, they assess external […]Read more
The UK Government has released its annual “Cyber Security Breaches Survey 2023”. It provides some valuable insights into how cyber security is currently being managed in the UK, by a range of organisations. It also speaks to how current competing economic priorities are impacting the effectiveness of some cyber security management efforts. The full report […]Read more
Solving the mismatch between cyber security reporting and directors’ requirements You are undoubtedly familiar with the headlines; you may have even become in part desensitised to them: ‘Cyber-attacks are increasingly damaging’, or ‘large amounts of personal data are most at risk’. The important take-away, however, is that modern day thieves can easily gain access to […]Read more
A system to address the untrustworthy security environment Zero trust approaches to security have been talked about for a while; but in recent times they have certainly gained more currency. As a model for protecting data and services, the simplicity of the concept is its biggest strength – assume, as a default position, there is […]Read more
Read by directors, executives, and security professionals globally, operating in the most complex of security environments.