Our cyber security products span from our next gen SIEM used in the most secure government and critical infrastructure environments, to automated cyber risk reporting applications for commercial and government organisations of all sizes.
It is useful for those involved in building or maintaining the Information Security Management System/ISMS.
Information Assurance helps to manage risk related to the use, processing, storage and transmission of information and data. It encompasses the scoping and operational practice of protecting and defending information across all considerations of people, process and technology.
A practical description of Information Assurance is ensuring that “the right people, have access to the right information, at the right time.” Clear business oriented objectives should be a core to any ISMS design and build. If you brief others outside of the Information Assurance and security environment, consider adopting a similarly simple explanation and avoid diving straight into discussions of Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability. This is a surefire way of alienating or confusing the audience.
Challenges arise where users assume that anything related to information is simply an IT deliverable and therefore any associated issue can only ever be a problem of the IT department. Be mindful that information security will be just one of many competing influences that come with their “day job”.
Information Assurance helps tackle these assumptions by ensuring information risks are treated more broadly. Hardware, software and IT are important, but addressing risks must take into account people and their behaviours around information and systems. This can include processes, workflows, physical security, training, levels of security awareness etc.
Cyber security originally came about to specifically address risks from “cyber space”. Consider this to include any communication or flow between computers and systems such as the internet.
Think back to the workplace before internet and “www.” and the multitude of Wide Area Networks, Local Area Networks and their dependencies with wired and wireless connections between them.
Cyber controls and defences would have been seen as a logical and technology oriented subset within the Information Assurance approach and ISMS. What has changed is that wider world has now embraced “cyber” as an all-encompassing term for just about anything to do with information, data and IT.
Let’s be honest here, headlines containing “Cyber Attack!” are going to be far more enticing than those leading with “Information Assurance” even if the accuracy might be questionable.
Cyber security seeks to address and mitigate risks associated with the operation, use and connectivity of IT itself and the threats posed by that same connectivity. Cyber security primarily focuses on the networks and systems, rather than the information itself. Having said this, we should accept that non-technical aspects of people and process now form the much broader cyber definition for most people.
If the choice of “cyber” means that operational colleagues, the board, investors, media and governments have a more interesting term to help describe the benefits, risks and opportunities then embrace it. It is an ideological sacrifice that is probably worth making.
Take the example of the UK National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) 10 Steps. This includes “User Education and Awareness” and describes policies, inductions, training etc. These are classic people and process measures in order to ensure the protection of information, but they have been broadly included within the headline of cyber security.
The term Information Assurance is valuable but fading from use. In the UK, it only really gained traction within the government and public sector security community via promotion of the Security Policy Framework (SPF) This is the approach to protect UK government assets (people, information and infrastructure).
Information Assurance is not obsolete but the value of it as a “headline subject” for those outside of our security world is now questionable.
Given this lack of traction or understanding outside of our community, it is time to reduce emphasis on the term as it becomes superseded by a focus on networks and systems (cyber security) and data protection through the profile of GDPR.
The UK market has its own regulators, security standards and challenges. And while rulings from SEC in the US or the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) in Australia don’t apply to UK companies, for the most part, the observations are undoubtedly relevant and the resulting advice instructive. It would be wrong to think UK financial […]Read more
<<< Part 2a: Australia’s Essential Eight: Beyond Endpoint Control <<< Part 2b: Activating UK NCSC & US NIST Guidelines: Beyond Endpoint Control Part 4: Systematic Measurement of Cyber Controls >>> As much as we invest into cyber security controls, external threats are inevitable. In a recent Notifiable Data Breaches Report from the Office of the […]Read more
Keen campers, scouts and even the Swiss Army know – that a good penknife is indispensable. This simple device has mitigated many a disaster at one point in time or another. Whether it’s to cut through a bit of string, tighten a screw or simply to solve the problem of no bottle opener in the […]Read more
Supply chain risk is an area of cyber security that demands the ongoing attention of every enterprise; because it can make the difference between being resilient or not. It’s no surprise that insurers warn that the vulnerability of supply chains is potentially a systemic risk that can quickly propagate across supply chain dominated industries. Organisations […]Read more
It took a “tripartite cyber assessment” by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) to identify that a sample of financial organisations had inadequate cyber security: poor security control management, a lack of business recovery planning and inadequate 3rd party risk assessment. Why were there gaps? Where is the failure? Clearly the common practice of unsubstantiated […]Read more
The discussion over data-driven vs qualitative cyber security assessment has been going for some time. Nowadays, it is at the top of the priority list for many security and senior executive teams. Managing cyber security has always been a noble ambition but without reliable measurement, the lack of actionable information makes evidence-based management decisions almost […]Read more
Attack Surface Management (ASM) characterises a business’s security risks as the monitoring and risk mitigation of a constantly changing and vulnerable “risk-surface”. Importantly, this attack surface extends to both internal and external assets and services. Some ASM solutions deliver clear visibility across both Internet facing and internal assets. Others do not. Instead, they assess external […]Read more
The UK Government has released its annual “Cyber Security Breaches Survey 2023”. It provides some valuable insights into how cyber security is currently being managed in the UK, by a range of organisations. It also speaks to how current competing economic priorities are impacting the effectiveness of some cyber security management efforts. The full report […]Read more
Solving the mismatch between cyber security reporting and directors’ requirements You are undoubtedly familiar with the headlines; you may have even become in part desensitised to them: ‘Cyber-attacks are increasingly damaging’, or ‘large amounts of personal data are most at risk’. The important take-away, however, is that modern day thieves can easily gain access to […]Read more
A system to address the untrustworthy security environment Zero trust approaches to security have been talked about for a while; but in recent times they have certainly gained more currency. As a model for protecting data and services, the simplicity of the concept is its biggest strength – assume, as a default position, there is […]Read more
Read by directors, executives, and security professionals globally, operating in the most complex of security environments.