Our cyber security products span from our next gen SIEM used in the most secure government and critical infrastructure environments, to automated cyber risk reporting applications for commercial and government organisations of all sizes.
How do you provide meaningful, actionable intelligence about cyber, data protection and identity security to multiple stakeholders? Governance, Risk and Compliance, or GRC tools, are the answer.
Reporting in an understandable format is fundamental to the success of any organisation, whether it be concerned with sales, manufacture, public service, IT or cyber services. If applied well, GRC forms 3 core pillars of organisational control to underpin an effective ISMS.
However, when it comes to cyber security, issues arise if it is assumed that the same level of security data and log traffic required by security analysts, will also adequately serve the needs of managers and risk owners.
These issues are compounded if the focus becomes one of compliance to a particular standard at a particular point in time (i.e. to pass an audit). We have probably all experienced how a short-sighted objective makes the ISMS less of a “system” and more a burdensome overhead. This approach leads to little or no business benefit, nothing in the way of sustained improvement and poor security resilience.
Governance is the ethical and effective management of an organisation by those at the top who are responsible for it. Our post on ISMS building tells you more but, governance involves the setting of strategy, direction and the optimisation of risks and resources.
Common fields of governance include:
It is an unavoidable truth that any management of any governance area requires the monitoring of performance to achieve objectives. The means that owners require and should actively seek accurate and timely feedback.
Proper management of risk enables the business to operate effectively and is the beating heart of a successful ISMS. Within the public sector this might involve ensuring the availability of critical services balanced with the need to robustly secure personal data. Within the commercial sector risk management might be required to stay competitive within a particular market.
Whatever the focus, the practice of identifying, measuring, reporting on and managing the risks directly impacts the achievement of objectives. For example, risk managers should routinely look for new government regulations that could impact the business such as EU GDPR or the mandated compliance with cyber security baselines such as the ASD 8 in Australia.
All risk managers should consider the known risks and come up with ways to mitigate them. The better risk managers consider how to continually monitor risk performance and use the feedback to inform timely decision making without impacting the business.
For anybody involved in data protection, compliance has recently taken centre stage with the advent of EU GDPR. This is true even for those outside of Europe due to the far-reaching consequences of the regulation that extend far down the supply chain.
For many the compliance challenge is no surprise. Consider those who have for years been bound by PCI-DSS and the considerations of handling payment card data. The majority of organisations are required either by law or by an industry regulator to meet a variety of information security standards, sometimes more than one at the same time.
The question for all is how do you get measureable improvement in your security posture as a result of ongoing investment in your information security?
Cyber security within the ISMS is like any other risk, it needs to be proactively managed. This means identifying, understanding and managing that risk much more effectively for all stakeholders.
GRC tools should be considered as enablers to improve the operational posture. Where applied to cyber security, they begin to deliver significant benefit especially when we consider the challenge of monitoring data creation and movement at speeds and scales that would have been unthinkable just a few short years ago.
GRC has the ability to tie the ISMS into the organisation at all levels so the relevance of any change in the technological status quo is recognised for both its security and business impact.
Business stakeholders need security GRC information and feedback to be translated into a language they can understand and a form that they can act upon.
The continuing challenge that Huntsman has solved for their customers, is to develop business-centric reporting providing tailored security metrics to meet the needs of the different business stakeholders. For them, good visibility enables fast and effective decision making.
This involves the alignment of GRC controls and compliance frameworks with real-time information. Others should also look to GRC solutions that are feature rich but can also quickly focus on the delivery of context and meaningful reporting to allow responders to comprehend and action threat intelligence.
It is unacceptable for risk owners to have to decrypt reporting or worse, consume manually built reports that date quickly or are subject to analytical bias. GRC reports must be based in fact to enable understanding of the implications for the board. This means that Role Based Reporting is critical, catering to the individual and the levels of risk that they are responsible for.
Only when this level of reporting is provided will timely business and risk decisions be made that are based upon facts rather than guesswork.
As cyber risks increase, organisations are encountering the longer life cycle of insurance renewals and the need to demonstrate better management of security controls and their effectiveness.Read more
Highlights and insights from the recent Managed Services Summit in London & the ISACA Central Chapter Conference on Digital Trust, in Birmingham, UK. With two recent conferences in the space of three days, some interesting challenges were very evident in the topics discussed. Being very different events, the challenges were quite different, but interestingly they […]Read more
In early August 2023, the latest joint advisory on persistent vulnerabilities was issued by the intelligence and security agencies of the “Five-eyes” community. These joint advisories are becoming more common. Perhaps recognising the growing importance of shared security information and the common nature of many of the threats faced – the weight they carry makes […]Read more
The quality of your risk assessment and the security information it provides is important; if you plan to use it to actively manage your operational and cyber resilience activities. Organisations are constantly exposed to a rapidly changing threat environment, so you really need a similarly rapid evidence-based feedback system that informs you of the ongoing […]Read more
The UK market has its own regulators, security standards and challenges. And while rulings from SEC in the US or the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) in Australia don’t apply to UK companies, for the most part, the observations are undoubtedly relevant and the resulting advice instructive. It would be wrong to think UK financial […]Read more
<<< Part 2a: Australia’s Essential Eight: Beyond Endpoint Control <<< Part 2b: Activating UK NCSC & US NIST Guidelines: Beyond Endpoint Control Part 4: Systematic Measurement of Cyber Controls >>> As much as we invest into cyber security controls, external threats are inevitable. In a recent Notifiable Data Breaches Report from the Office of the […]Read more
Keen campers, scouts and even the Swiss Army know – that a good penknife is indispensable. This simple device has mitigated many a disaster at one point in time or another. Whether it’s to cut through a bit of string, tighten a screw or simply to solve the problem of no bottle opener in the […]Read more
Supply chain risk is an area of cyber security that demands the ongoing attention of every enterprise; because it can make the difference between being resilient or not. It’s no surprise that insurers warn that the vulnerability of supply chains is potentially a systemic risk that can quickly propagate across supply chain dominated industries. Organisations […]Read more
It took a “tripartite cyber assessment” by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) to identify that a sample of financial organisations had inadequate cyber security: poor security control management, a lack of business recovery planning and inadequate 3rd party risk assessment. Why were there gaps? Where is the failure? Clearly the common practice of unsubstantiated […]Read more
The discussion over data-driven vs qualitative cyber security assessment has been going for some time. Nowadays, it is at the top of the priority list for many security and senior executive teams. Managing cyber security has always been a noble ambition but without reliable measurement, the lack of actionable information makes evidence-based management decisions almost […]Read more
Read by directors, executives, and security professionals globally, operating in the most complex of security environments.