Our cyber security products span from our next gen SIEM used in the most secure government and critical infrastructure environments, to automated cyber risk reporting applications for commercial and government organisations of all sizes.
The MITRE ATT&CK Framework of tactics and techniques used by attackers to probe and compromise systems is attracting a lot of attention. We’ve covered it in several blogs posts here, here and here. But is it just a framework for enterprises to manage their own low-level “root and branch” technical security? Or can it be used by MSSPs who might not be involved in that more user and workstation-centric end of cyber security monitoring?
Let’s look at the MITRE ATT&CK Framework and some ideas for Managed Security Service Providers …
Managed services often start with a small set of systems – a balance between what the MSSP would like to be monitoring and what the customer wants to spend. This might be perimeter firewalls and IDS initially as they are an effective “front line” for attacks but also quite easy for the MSSP to get access to as they are at the edge of the customer’s network.
However, the reality is – and any MSSP sales person will tell you – the more systems they monitor the better the chances of detection and the more information they can provide relating to an incident. So, if you add to that logs from the domain servers, DHCP servers, proxies, network routers and even workstations then you will get a lot more information relating to a suspicious firewall or IDS alert. You might know who the user is for a given IP address, where they are sitting, when they logged on, what files they accessed, what they did just before the network traffic started…
What MITRE ATT&CK gives you (the MSSP) is a framework for these conversations. For example if you take a MITRE technique like “exfiltration over a web service” (using something like Dropbox basically – see https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1567/002/) you could detect that from the firewall traffic, but if you wanted to know who the user is or where they are sitting or what files they are sharing, you need to see what’s going on at the workstation or file server. Hence you can build sales propositions based around the value of the MITRE techniques that they can provide visibility of. And the more points you are monitoring and the more data you are holding, the higher the service revenue, and the more valuable the service becomes in terms of detection and resolution.
When providing reports that have come from technical systems and data, that have then been interpreted by technical experts, that then get sent to, and read by, non-expert or non-technical managers can often require translation and explanation…
What is SQL injection and how bad is it? What does “pass the hash” involve? Should I be worried about this? Is a tcpdump painful?
The MITRE ATT&CK Framework allows the techniques that fall within it to be classified by the “type of goal” of the attacker and also – from left to right – you get a view of the severity, that is more than just Low-Medium-High. The spatial location on the framework shows how far along the attack lifecycle the particular scenario is.
As such, contextualising reports against MITRE is useful, but also showing where the wider spread of alerts sits can give a visual indication of how serious an event (or a series of events) might actually be. Lots of detections that create a cluster on the left-hand-side of the matrix might sound bad but could be merely probes and noise. One single alert from the right-hand-side of the matrix could be an out-and-out data loss.
When moving beyond providing monitoring services into more active (and lucrative) managed detection and response, it can be hard to frame these kinds of services in such a way that the risks of false positives become acceptable. You don’t want to disable a user account just because someone has been accessing the network from China, it could be someone who is visiting a supplier.
However, by attaching agreed responses or next steps to known and defined attack patterns and scenarios means that the risk can be better understood and the response services more tightly defined.
So, you might or might not take action against login failures or forgotten application passwords, but it’s much easier to agree that a password spraying attack (https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1110/003/) from a given host is a concern and should result in that network address or host being automatically blocked. Hence allowing the MSSP to offer a response service that is fully achievable for them and fully understandable to the customer is preferable.
All MSSPs want to grow their business, expand their service offerings and increase the value from existing customers. Having the ability to create the rationale for this, that supports customer understanding around what those value-added services are, how they work and what the benefits are, is the trick.
MITRE ATT&CK allows these discussions to take place against a widely regarded, clear and granular backdrop. If you want to up-sell additional detection and response capabilities, tying these to a known framework that is independent means that the sales process is easier and has a greater chance of success. Moreover, it helps structure the way services are described, operated, reported on and delivered.
The UK market has its own regulators, security standards and challenges. And while rulings from SEC in the US or the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) in Australia don’t apply to UK companies, for the most part, the observations are undoubtedly relevant and the resulting advice instructive. It would be wrong to think UK financial […]Read more
<<< Part 2a: Australia’s Essential Eight: Beyond Endpoint Control <<< Part 2b: Activating UK NCSC & US NIST Guidelines: Beyond Endpoint Control Part 4: Systematic Measurement of Cyber Controls >>> As much as we invest into cyber security controls, external threats are inevitable. In a recent Notifiable Data Breaches Report from the Office of the […]Read more
Keen campers, scouts and even the Swiss Army know – that a good penknife is indispensable. This simple device has mitigated many a disaster at one point in time or another. Whether it’s to cut through a bit of string, tighten a screw or simply to solve the problem of no bottle opener in the […]Read more
Supply chain risk is an area of cyber security that demands the ongoing attention of every enterprise; because it can make the difference between being resilient or not. It’s no surprise that insurers warn that the vulnerability of supply chains is potentially a systemic risk that can quickly propagate across supply chain dominated industries. Organisations […]Read more
It took a “tripartite cyber assessment” by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) to identify that a sample of financial organisations had inadequate cyber security: poor security control management, a lack of business recovery planning and inadequate 3rd party risk assessment. Why were there gaps? Where is the failure? Clearly the common practice of unsubstantiated […]Read more
The discussion over data-driven vs qualitative cyber security assessment has been going for some time. Nowadays, it is at the top of the priority list for many security and senior executive teams. Managing cyber security has always been a noble ambition but without reliable measurement, the lack of actionable information makes evidence-based management decisions almost […]Read more
Attack Surface Management (ASM) characterises a business’s security risks as the monitoring and risk mitigation of a constantly changing and vulnerable “risk-surface”. Importantly, this attack surface extends to both internal and external assets and services. Some ASM solutions deliver clear visibility across both Internet facing and internal assets. Others do not. Instead, they assess external […]Read more
The UK Government has released its annual “Cyber Security Breaches Survey 2023”. It provides some valuable insights into how cyber security is currently being managed in the UK, by a range of organisations. It also speaks to how current competing economic priorities are impacting the effectiveness of some cyber security management efforts. The full report […]Read more
Solving the mismatch between cyber security reporting and directors’ requirements You are undoubtedly familiar with the headlines; you may have even become in part desensitised to them: ‘Cyber-attacks are increasingly damaging’, or ‘large amounts of personal data are most at risk’. The important take-away, however, is that modern day thieves can easily gain access to […]Read more
A system to address the untrustworthy security environment Zero trust approaches to security have been talked about for a while; but in recent times they have certainly gained more currency. As a model for protecting data and services, the simplicity of the concept is its biggest strength – assume, as a default position, there is […]Read more
Read by directors, executives, and security professionals globally, operating in the most complex of security environments.