Our cyber security products span from our next gen SIEM used in the most secure government and critical infrastructure environments, to automated cyber risk reporting applications for commercial and government organisations of all sizes.
Security operations, by their nature, are a highly technical and complex set of activities that demand SOC teams deeply understand the threats they face and the attack vectors they protect. Gaining complete coverage was challenging, and without architecture or standards to map their efforts, a comprehensive visibility of threats was impossible.
MITRE has changed this by publishing ATT&CK as an open framework and knowledge base of cyber attacks. It’s readily available to security analysts and contains a complete list of adversary tactics and techniques, all of which are based on real-world telemetry and reports MITRE has gathered over the years. The framework has a scientific basis in observation, making it the perfect way to orient the efforts of the SOC.
Let’s look at how tools are now evolving to adopt MITRE ATT&CK and how this changes the operations game to place defenders on a level playing field with attackers.
ATT&CK can be used to underpin the cyber defence processes your security operations team uses, combining observed adversary tactics and techniques into a common language so that monitoring and response efforts can be quickly informed by security information in the repository. It bolsters detection and Incident Response (IR) both as a management and technical framework by allowing responders to identify and classify incidents while providing the details on what artefacts threat hunters should be looking for. Security managers can use ATT&CK to map current detection capability and security controls while identifying gaps in security architecture to highlight where the SOC team may need to develop rules and visibility further.
ATT&CK’s structured approach to classifying techniques maps at a high level to the cyber “kill chain” concept in that it begins with the categories of reconnaissance and resource development, and initial access, and then encompasses the various phases of a successful attack through to command and control, exfiltration and impacts. Each category of tactics contains a list of techniques and sub-techniques (varying iterations of methods), each explained in terms of the technology used to achieve it, the threat actors commonly associated with using it and any recommended mitigations.
MITRE keeps ATT&CK up to date with the most recent technical details so that any changes to observed adversary methods are quickly available to framework subscribers, to ensure SOC teams can develop new detection rules speedily and efficiently. One additional element of the ATT&CK framework that’s vitally important to SOC teams and security managers alike is that it describes mitigations for each technique so operators know how to respond.
Each technique and sub-technique included in MITRE ATT&CK contains a list of recommendations of countermeasures. To better protect the enterprise, the nature of these measures range from specific controls through to broader risk management strategies.
“Adversaries may use brute force techniques to gain access to accounts when passwords are unknown or when password hashes are obtained. Without knowledge of the password for an account or set of accounts, an adversary may systematically guess the password using a repetitive or iterative mechanism. Brute forcing passwords can take place via interaction with a service that will check the validity of those credentials or offline against previously acquired credential data, such as password hashes.”
The corresponding ATT&CK mitigation strategies suggested for a Brute Force attack include::
SOC teams can also refer to this entry for detection recommendations, and setting rules to identify such behaviour with their monitoring tools – including their Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) system.
For brute force attacks, SOC teams can monitor both system and application logs for failures against valid accounts, especially if authentication failures are high in volume or unusually frequent, indicating there may be a brute force attack underway. SOC teams can also monitor for failed authentication attempts across several accounts at once, which may indicate password spraying.
SOC technologies, such as SIEM and Security Analytics platforms, that incorporate the MITRE ATT&CK framework as a standard reference model, can rapidly prioritise threats and assist SOC analysts in deciding which alarms to tackle first. Given there are now over 500 techniques in ATT&CK, having the SIEM automatically profile and report on activity patterns in this way, allows SOC teams to determine the stage of the attack lifecycle that a detected event relates to, and so how successful that attack may be.
As you can see in the Summary Dashboard shown in Figure 1 (captured from the forthcoming release of Huntsman Security’s NextGen SIEM), the top 10 threat targets and techniques can be easily highlighted for investigation, while at the same time serving as a rapid reference monitor for SOC management to understand where to best focus their response efforts. By allowing analysts to look at attacks by type and observed technique priority, they can streamline their response workflows. At a macro level also, the team is less likely to miss crucial detections during busy periods of high alert volumes.
Analysts can quickly drill further into the MITRE data, expose the source of an alert and deploy the incident response team to investigate and shut it down if it’s a real attack.
Huntsman Security has adopted the MITRE ATT&CK framework as a key capability of our SIEM product. If you want more information on our forthcoming release, get in touch with our team.
<<< Part 2a: Australia’s Essential Eight: Beyond Endpoint Control <<< Part 2b: Activating UK NCSC & US NIST Guidelines: Beyond Endpoint Control Part 4: Systematic Measurement of Cyber Controls >>> As much as we invest into cyber security controls, external threats are inevitable. In a recent Notifiable Data Breaches Report from the Office of the […]Read more
Keen campers, scouts and even the Swiss Army know – that a good penknife is indispensable. This simple device has mitigated many a disaster at one point in time or another. Whether it’s to cut through a bit of string, tighten a screw or simply to solve the problem of no bottle opener in the […]Read more
Supply chain risk is an area of cyber security that demands the ongoing attention of every enterprise; because it can make the difference between being resilient or not. It’s no surprise that insurers warn that the vulnerability of supply chains is potentially a systemic risk that can quickly propagate across supply chain dominated industries. Organisations […]Read more
It took a “tripartite cyber assessment” by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) to identify that a sample of financial organisations had inadequate cyber security: poor security control management, a lack of business recovery planning and inadequate 3rd party risk assessment. Why were there gaps? Where is the failure? Clearly the common practice of unsubstantiated […]Read more
The discussion over data-driven vs qualitative cyber security assessment has been going for some time. Nowadays, it is at the top of the priority list for many security and senior executive teams. Managing cyber security has always been a noble ambition but without reliable measurement, the lack of actionable information makes evidence-based management decisions almost […]Read more
Attack Surface Management (ASM) characterises a business’s security risks as the monitoring and risk mitigation of a constantly changing and vulnerable “risk-surface”. Importantly, this attack surface extends to both internal and external assets and services. Some ASM solutions deliver clear visibility across both Internet facing and internal assets. Others do not. Instead, they assess external […]Read more
The UK Government has released its annual “Cyber Security Breaches Survey 2023”. It provides some valuable insights into how cyber security is currently being managed in the UK, by a range of organisations. It also speaks to how current competing economic priorities are impacting the effectiveness of some cyber security management efforts. The full report […]Read more
Solving the mismatch between cyber security reporting and directors’ requirements You are undoubtedly familiar with the headlines; you may have even become in part desensitised to them: ‘Cyber-attacks are increasingly damaging’, or ‘large amounts of personal data are most at risk’. The important take-away, however, is that modern day thieves can easily gain access to […]Read more
A system to address the untrustworthy security environment Zero trust approaches to security have been talked about for a while; but in recent times they have certainly gained more currency. As a model for protecting data and services, the simplicity of the concept is its biggest strength – assume, as a default position, there is […]Read more
The ongoing protection of Critical Infrastructure from cyber-attacks has implications for us all – whether it’s supporting our health, well-being or simply our way of life, there is good reason to reflect on the effectiveness your cyber security. Cyber security risks are nothing new and the vulnerability of critical infrastructure to them (and the heightened […]Read more
Read by directors, executives, and security professionals globally, operating in the most complex of security environments.