Our cyber security products span from our next gen SIEM used in the most secure government and critical infrastructure environments, to automated cyber risk reporting applications for commercial and government organisations of all sizes.
Modern threat prevention technologies only work well in defending against opportunistic attacks. Incorporating Protective Monitoring ensures a more proactive approach.
Once you are targeted, with your information in the sights of an attacker, these countermeasures won’t keep them out for long. Furthermore, most defence-oriented security technologies only provide visibility and awareness relating to the early stages of an attack. Businesses need to consider extending their governance to incorporate incident response in a more proactive approach to threat management.
Most companies focus their security budget on blocking and prevention, using antimalware systems, firewalls and intrusion prevention systems (IPS). There is no denying that these products are required, but they only provide one lens from which to view security, yet other threat actors remain unseen, and attack vectors remain unchecked.
Take, for example, an employee who has legitimate access to your customer database, who is planning to leave your organisation. You don’t know their intentions are malicious when they try to copy all your customer information onto a removable USB thumb drive. Nevertheless, this kind of attack is commonplace, and no antivirus product, firewall or even IPS will identify this as malicious.
To allow you to detect insider attacks, you need to consider protective monitoring. But before we talk about what it means, it is important to understand that security is a process that requires continual attention from the team responsible for keeping your information safe. You cannot simply throw technology at the problem and consider yourself secure – even the best technology needs continual tuning, tweaking and adjustment to remain appropriate and sufficient to deal with the latest threats. So, this leads us to on to considering protective monitoring in the context of your overall security architecture.
Unlike the preventative techniques discussed earlier, where each system has a particular purpose, protective monitoring is a pervasive and holistic security capability that applies to any number of attack scenarios across the entire kill chain.
Your SIEM can indeed collect and store event logs from your antivirus technology, firewalls and IPSs, but you can also be smart about using it to detect less-obvious attacks. For example, following on from the insider threat example, there are numerous places where the employee interacts with technology that produce logs.
If you configure your customer relationship management system to generate a log event each time a record is accessed, registering the username, time and IP address where the request came from, you’ll be able to build a picture over time of what looks typical.
If your sales professionals often download one or two records at a time, per customer contact, this is considered standard with the tolerance set as a threshold of five records (just to remove false positives). However, an employee generating 25 records within the space of just ten minutes bucks the trend and may indicate an attack. Using attack indicators, based on unusual user behaviour is the best way of detecting insider attacks. However, you will need to work with your SOC team, so they understand what normal looks like and give them the information they need to think differently about how an attack looks.
Situational awareness lies at the heart of any proactive security capability. Whilst traditional blocking technologies are still required, actionable intelligence comes from tuning systems and applications to log behaviours, based on deep understanding of how people and systems operate. Using a SIEM, you can prioritise risky behaviours and use thresholds and baselines to offer actionable insight to your SOC team; allowing them to investigate suspicious activity and mitigate your organisation’s time at risk.
A recent KPMG Report suggests that protecting against and dealing with cyber risks will be the major challenge for senior executives in 2024. It is clear that despite high levels of security investment, organisations continue to suffer from cyber attacks.Read more
The Australian Signals Directorate’s (ASD) recent publication of their Cyber Threat Report 2022-2023 unearthed a range of areas for concern for government departments and critical infrastructure entities at local, State and Federal level.Read more
As cyber risks increase, organisations are encountering the longer life cycle of insurance renewals and the need to demonstrate better management of security controls and their effectiveness.Read more
Highlights and insights from the recent Managed Services Summit in London & the ISACA Central Chapter Conference on Digital Trust, in Birmingham, UK. With two recent conferences in the space of three days, some interesting challenges were very evident in the topics discussed. Being very different events, the challenges were quite different, but interestingly they […]Read more
In early August 2023, the latest joint advisory on persistent vulnerabilities was issued by the intelligence and security agencies of the “Five-eyes” community. These joint advisories are becoming more common. Perhaps recognising the growing importance of shared security information and the common nature of many of the threats faced – the weight they carry makes […]Read more
The quality of your risk assessment and the security information it provides is important; if you plan to use it to actively manage your operational and cyber resilience activities. Organisations are constantly exposed to a rapidly changing threat environment, so you really need a similarly rapid evidence-based feedback system that informs you of the ongoing […]Read more
The UK market has its own regulators, security standards and challenges. And while rulings from SEC in the US or the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) in Australia don’t apply to UK companies, for the most part, the observations are undoubtedly relevant and the resulting advice instructive. It would be wrong to think UK financial […]Read more
<<< Part 2a: Australia’s Essential Eight: Beyond Endpoint Control <<< Part 2b: Activating UK NCSC & US NIST Guidelines: Beyond Endpoint Control Part 4: Systematic Measurement of Cyber Controls >>> As much as we invest into cyber security controls, external threats are inevitable. In a recent Notifiable Data Breaches Report from the Office of the […]Read more
Keen campers, scouts and even the Swiss Army know – that a good penknife is indispensable. This simple device has mitigated many a disaster at one point in time or another. Whether it’s to cut through a bit of string, tighten a screw or simply to solve the problem of no bottle opener in the […]Read more
Supply chain risk is an area of cyber security that demands the ongoing attention of every enterprise; because it can make the difference between being resilient or not. It’s no surprise that insurers warn that the vulnerability of supply chains is potentially a systemic risk that can quickly propagate across supply chain dominated industries. Organisations […]Read more
Read by directors, executives, and security professionals globally, operating in the most complex of security environments.