Our cyber security products span from our next gen SIEM used in the most secure government and critical infrastructure environments, to automated cyber risk reporting applications for commercial and government organisations of all sizes.
Modern threat prevention technologies only work well in defending against opportunistic attacks. Incorporating Protective Monitoring ensures a more proactive approach.
Once you are targeted, with your information in the sights of an attacker, these countermeasures won’t keep them out for long. Furthermore, most defence-oriented security technologies only provide visibility and awareness relating to the early stages of an attack. Businesses need to consider extending their governance to incorporate incident response in a more proactive approach to threat management.
Most companies focus their security budget on blocking and prevention, using antimalware systems, firewalls and intrusion prevention systems (IPS). There is no denying that these products are required, but they only provide one lens from which to view security, yet other threat actors remain unseen, and attack vectors remain unchecked.
Take, for example, an employee who has legitimate access to your customer database, who is planning to leave your organisation. You don’t know their intentions are malicious when they try to copy all your customer information onto a removable USB thumb drive. Nevertheless, this kind of attack is commonplace, and no antivirus product, firewall or even IPS will identify this as malicious.
To allow you to detect insider attacks, you need to consider protective monitoring. But before we talk about what it means, it is important to understand that security is a process that requires continual attention from the team responsible for keeping your information safe. You cannot simply throw technology at the problem and consider yourself secure – even the best technology needs continual tuning, tweaking and adjustment to remain appropriate and sufficient to deal with the latest threats. So, this leads us to on to considering protective monitoring in the context of your overall security architecture.
Unlike the preventative techniques discussed earlier, where each system has a particular purpose, protective monitoring is a pervasive and holistic security capability that applies to any number of attack scenarios across the entire kill chain.
Your SIEM can indeed collect and store event logs from your antivirus technology, firewalls and IPSs, but you can also be smart about using it to detect less-obvious attacks. For example, following on from the insider threat example, there are numerous places where the employee interacts with technology that produce logs.
If you configure your customer relationship management system to generate a log event each time a record is accessed, registering the username, time and IP address where the request came from, you’ll be able to build a picture over time of what looks typical.
If your sales professionals often download one or two records at a time, per customer contact, this is considered standard with the tolerance set as a threshold of five records (just to remove false positives). However, an employee generating 25 records within the space of just ten minutes bucks the trend and may indicate an attack. Using attack indicators, based on unusual user behaviour is the best way of detecting insider attacks. However, you will need to work with your SOC team, so they understand what normal looks like and give them the information they need to think differently about how an attack looks.
Situational awareness lies at the heart of any proactive security capability. Whilst traditional blocking technologies are still required, actionable intelligence comes from tuning systems and applications to log behaviours, based on deep understanding of how people and systems operate. Using a SIEM, you can prioritise risky behaviours and use thresholds and baselines to offer actionable insight to your SOC team; allowing them to investigate suspicious activity and mitigate your organisation’s time at risk.
<<< Part 2a: Australia’s Essential Eight: Beyond Endpoint Control <<< Part 2b: Activating UK NCSC & US NIST Guidelines: Beyond Endpoint Control Part 4: Systematic Measurement of Cyber Controls >>> As much as we invest into cyber security controls, external threats are inevitable. In a recent Notifiable Data Breaches Report from the Office of the […]Read more
Keen campers, scouts and even the Swiss Army know – that a good penknife is indispensable. This simple device has mitigated many a disaster at one point in time or another. Whether it’s to cut through a bit of string, tighten a screw or simply to solve the problem of no bottle opener in the […]Read more
Supply chain risk is an area of cyber security that demands the ongoing attention of every enterprise; because it can make the difference between being resilient or not. It’s no surprise that insurers warn that the vulnerability of supply chains is potentially a systemic risk that can quickly propagate across supply chain dominated industries. Organisations […]Read more
It took a “tripartite cyber assessment” by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) to identify that a sample of financial organisations had inadequate cyber security: poor security control management, a lack of business recovery planning and inadequate 3rd party risk assessment. Why were there gaps? Where is the failure? Clearly the common practice of unsubstantiated […]Read more
The discussion over data-driven vs qualitative cyber security assessment has been going for some time. Nowadays, it is at the top of the priority list for many security and senior executive teams. Managing cyber security has always been a noble ambition but without reliable measurement, the lack of actionable information makes evidence-based management decisions almost […]Read more
Attack Surface Management (ASM) characterises a business’s security risks as the monitoring and risk mitigation of a constantly changing and vulnerable “risk-surface”. Importantly, this attack surface extends to both internal and external assets and services. Some ASM solutions deliver clear visibility across both Internet facing and internal assets. Others do not. Instead, they assess external […]Read more
The UK Government has released its annual “Cyber Security Breaches Survey 2023”. It provides some valuable insights into how cyber security is currently being managed in the UK, by a range of organisations. It also speaks to how current competing economic priorities are impacting the effectiveness of some cyber security management efforts. The full report […]Read more
Solving the mismatch between cyber security reporting and directors’ requirements You are undoubtedly familiar with the headlines; you may have even become in part desensitised to them: ‘Cyber-attacks are increasingly damaging’, or ‘large amounts of personal data are most at risk’. The important take-away, however, is that modern day thieves can easily gain access to […]Read more
A system to address the untrustworthy security environment Zero trust approaches to security have been talked about for a while; but in recent times they have certainly gained more currency. As a model for protecting data and services, the simplicity of the concept is its biggest strength – assume, as a default position, there is […]Read more
The ongoing protection of Critical Infrastructure from cyber-attacks has implications for us all – whether it’s supporting our health, well-being or simply our way of life, there is good reason to reflect on the effectiveness your cyber security. Cyber security risks are nothing new and the vulnerability of critical infrastructure to them (and the heightened […]Read more
Read by directors, executives, and security professionals globally, operating in the most complex of security environments.