Our cyber security products span from our next gen SIEM used in the most secure government and critical infrastructure environments, to automated cyber risk reporting applications for commercial and government organisations of all sizes.
The latest Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) compliance report for the period 2017-18 was released by Australia’s Attorney General’s Department last week. The PSPF defines the Australian Government’s security classifications and associated handling protections of official information.
Of the 36 mandatory requirements across the four key areas within the PSPF including security governance, information security, personnel security and physical security, the compliance level to mandatory requirement INFOSEC-4, remains the lowest at 61.7%. INFOSEC-4 sets out the requirements for implementing cyber and ICT system security, including the Australian Cyber Security Centre’s ACSC Essential 8. You can read the full report here.
Learn why ICT system security is so important, why it is so difficult to achieve and maintain and how scorecard technology and how it can help you to start measuring, reporting, improving and tracking your organisation’s performance.
Cyber resilience, ergo information security, is a corporate business issue as it affects an organisation’s competitiveness. It is not a merely an IT task that can be set and forgotten. Businesses can be financially impacted from a data breach, which can hurt the bank account but is retrievable. However, the effect of reputational damage or national security compromises can be catastrophic and irrevocable.
The reality is that cyber resilience isn’t a race to the finish line; instead, it’s a continuous effort to respond to changes within the dynamic environment your organisation operates within. Security monitoring can identify compliant controls today that become non-compliant tomorrow; annual audits present a fleeting glimpse of security control effectiveness. Visibility of your organisation’s real-time security posture is fundamental to achieving an ongoing, robust level of cyber resilience.
The best approach to improving cyber resilience is to establish continuous security monitoring that will identify real-time deviations from your organisation’s acceptable control baseline. Does this sound like an ideal that you are never going to be able to achieve? Security scorecard technology, with its ability to continuously monitor security control effectiveness, can help your security team; even if you’re working with a limited number of skilled security staff and a modest budget.
Once established in your organisation, security scorecard technology can provide the following outcomes:
Huntsman Security’s Essential 8 Scorecard continuously collects evidence from information and log sources across the ICT environment and measures the effectiveness of security controls against each of the Essential 8’s KPIs.
The PSPF was reformed in October 2018, you can find full details here: https://www.protectivesecurity.gov.au/. Organisations will be subject to the new requirements from October 2020. PSPF Core Requirement 10, safeguarding information from cyber threats, stipulates that organisations must implement the ‘Top 4’ of the Essential 8 Security Controls: Application Whitelisting, Patching Applications, Restrict Administrative Privileges and Patch Operating Systems.
Whether you are a CIO, Risk Manager, Information Security Managers or a Security Analyst you need to have visibility of your cyber risk in order to manage it effectively. The Essential 8 Scorecard provides support for stakeholders across the organisation:
The Essential 8 Scorecard delivers automated reports that give objective metrics of latest cyber posture, maturity level against the Essential 8 Framework as well as trend reports showing performance over time.
Essential 8 Scorecard – Performance Trend Report
In addition to the reports provided to management, the Essential 8 Scorecard provides reports to Information Security Managers detailing the lead-performance metrics for each of the Essential 8 mitigation strategies in relation to the Essential 8 Framework.
Essential 8 Scorecard Report
The Essential 8 Scorecard provides the cyber ops team with an operational dashboard showing real-time performance of the Essential 8 controls. In addition to the real-time dashboards showing compliance to the controls, security analysts will receive alerts about specific areas of concern. This will allow prioritisation of tasks to support the mitigation of those areas of greatest risk exposure.
Essential 8 Scorecard – Operational Dashboard
The latest release of the PSPF is intended to embed a strong security culture and requires that each entity must report on security each financial year to:
2. Affected entities whose interests or security arrangements could be affected by the outcome of unmitigated security risks, security incidents or vulnerabilities in PSPF implementation, and;
3. The Australian Signals Directorate in relation to cyber security matters.
Self-assessment of any security control effectiveness introduces subjectivity. The Australian National Audit Office’s (ANAO) commented on their findings in their Cyber Resilience Performance Audit Report, published in June 2018:
3.15 In the absence of a common control self-assessment methodology and guidance, including a broader grading scheme, entities may continue to inaccurately self-assess and report on the adequacy of security controls.
The functionality of the Essential 8 Scorecard is founded on the ACSC Essential 8 Security Controls, a framework developed to support the ongoing resilience of Australian Government departments. The framework, combined with the scorecard technology, delivers an objective, quantitative measure of cyber risk you can rely on to benchmark, manage, track and communicate your organisation’s cyber risk.
<<< Part 2a: Australia’s Essential Eight: Beyond Endpoint Control <<< Part 2b: Activating UK NCSC & US NIST Guidelines: Beyond Endpoint Control Part 4: Systematic Measurement of Cyber Controls >>> As much as we invest into cyber security controls, external threats are inevitable. In a recent Notifiable Data Breaches Report from the Office of the […]Read more
Keen campers, scouts and even the Swiss Army know – that a good penknife is indispensable. This simple device has mitigated many a disaster at one point in time or another. Whether it’s to cut through a bit of string, tighten a screw or simply to solve the problem of no bottle opener in the […]Read more
Supply chain risk is an area of cyber security that demands the ongoing attention of every enterprise; because it can make the difference between being resilient or not. It’s no surprise that insurers warn that the vulnerability of supply chains is potentially a systemic risk that can quickly propagate across supply chain dominated industries. Organisations […]Read more
It took a “tripartite cyber assessment” by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) to identify that a sample of financial organisations had inadequate cyber security: poor security control management, a lack of business recovery planning and inadequate 3rd party risk assessment. Why were there gaps? Where is the failure? Clearly the common practice of unsubstantiated […]Read more
The discussion over data-driven vs qualitative cyber security assessment has been going for some time. Nowadays, it is at the top of the priority list for many security and senior executive teams. Managing cyber security has always been a noble ambition but without reliable measurement, the lack of actionable information makes evidence-based management decisions almost […]Read more
Attack Surface Management (ASM) characterises a business’s security risks as the monitoring and risk mitigation of a constantly changing and vulnerable “risk-surface”. Importantly, this attack surface extends to both internal and external assets and services. Some ASM solutions deliver clear visibility across both Internet facing and internal assets. Others do not. Instead, they assess external […]Read more
The UK Government has released its annual “Cyber Security Breaches Survey 2023”. It provides some valuable insights into how cyber security is currently being managed in the UK, by a range of organisations. It also speaks to how current competing economic priorities are impacting the effectiveness of some cyber security management efforts. The full report […]Read more
Solving the mismatch between cyber security reporting and directors’ requirements You are undoubtedly familiar with the headlines; you may have even become in part desensitised to them: ‘Cyber-attacks are increasingly damaging’, or ‘large amounts of personal data are most at risk’. The important take-away, however, is that modern day thieves can easily gain access to […]Read more
A system to address the untrustworthy security environment Zero trust approaches to security have been talked about for a while; but in recent times they have certainly gained more currency. As a model for protecting data and services, the simplicity of the concept is its biggest strength – assume, as a default position, there is […]Read more
The ongoing protection of Critical Infrastructure from cyber-attacks has implications for us all – whether it’s supporting our health, well-being or simply our way of life, there is good reason to reflect on the effectiveness your cyber security. Cyber security risks are nothing new and the vulnerability of critical infrastructure to them (and the heightened […]Read more
Read by directors, executives, and security professionals globally, operating in the most complex of security environments.