Our cyber security products span from our next gen SIEM used in the most secure government and critical infrastructure environments, to automated cyber risk reporting applications for commercial and government organisations of all sizes.
Whether you’re building a Security Operations Centre (SOC) or replacing your existing security monitoring tools, when it’s time to evaluate the best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) product for your business, the decision on which platform best suits your needs should look beyond core functionality, such as security event log collection and correlation, rather you should evaluate its additional capabilities and integrations since the broader the functionality the more chance you’ll have of catching attackers on your network.
Modern security operations centres (SOC) have refocused their attention from a purely network centric view to proactive cyber threat management. Technology platforms are supporting this by integrating a variety of capabilities together and relying on threat intelligence and ingestion of security events from networks, endpoints and applications to catch attackers much earlier in the kill chain.
The SIEM is the most commonly deployed technology platform in a SOC since it offers the most fundamental capability a SOC needs – continuous protective monitoring of log sources across the enterprise. The reality is that event monitoring has been at the heart of SOC services for decades, but today’s attackers are much more sophisticated and sneaky than they have ever been before, which has led to a notable reduction in detection rates where event logging and correlation are the only services provided.
Organisations continue to purchase and deploy traditional SIEMs, with a tacit understanding that they cannot do without its core functionality. Yet the additional insight the SOC requires to protect the business can only be derived from systems that incorporate threat intelligence and advanced attack profiling, automated incident response, and weave in behavioural analysis to detect unusual activity that could be missed under normal SOC monitoring circumstances. This evolved SIEM is commonly known as Security Analytics (SA), SIM 2.0 or next-generation SIM.
Atop the core capabilities of basic event monitoring and correlation, technology selection should be based on understanding the business problems you are trying to solve. For example, if you are a critical infrastructure operator, you’ll likely have an Operational Technology (OT) network, so your SOC capability should be extended to monitor that side of the business as well as traditional IT networks. You’ll have a different threat model and different attacks to respond to, since OT networks are harder to monitor (due to limited bandwidth and legacy equipment). Furthermore, the risk to OT networks is different, since most attacks affecting OT systems relate to integrity and availability rather than confidentiality.
No matter what the context, the SIEM needs to integrate with all your business technologies and collect logs from as many different log sources as possible, such as standalone SCADA systems, specialist management applications and even text files if that’s where proprietary applications store operational logs.
In many cases, attackers will use a combination of tools and techniques that allow them to remain undetected by traditional SIEM technology. Therefore user behavioural anomaly detection has become another important tool in the SOC’s toolkit. If you can profile what normal looks like on your network, or what normal user interaction with an application looks like, you can set thresholds that, if breached, raise an alert within the SOC. It might be that the system is still performing normally, but is under abnormal loading, which might be for a legitimate reason, but it also worth investigating.
The last feature we’ll consider in SIEM selection is scalability. It goes without saying that your chosen solution needs to meet your current business requirements, but it should also be able to scale to meet future growth or change. If your company has a cloud-first strategy, where new systems must be deployed in the public cloud, you will still need to be able to collect, process and correlate security event logs and monitor user behaviour.
Some SIEM providers have a flexible model that works both on premise and in the cloud, so that’s a good place to start. However, you need to look at how integrated the cloud capability is, since running in the cloud doesn’t guarantee it can see the logs below the infrastructure layer it’s deployed in. Take, for example, a SIEM system deployed into Amazon’s AWS. Amazon will provide robust security around the outside of the container they provide to you, but the security of the systems inside the containers remains each customer’s own responsibility.
If you have cloud systems today or cloud ambitions in the future, then you need to consider the following:
Each of those questions should be answered prior to selecting your vendor, since the SOC model you require can change dramatically when you factor in cloud services. It may well be more beneficial to run your SOC as a virtual SOC in the cloud, alongside the rest of your infrastructure, rather than maintaining on-premise security technology that must collect logs remotely.
In a landscape where security teams have to manage more information and more complexity, while at the same time remain efficient, it is clear that you and your team need more context, greater insights and automation.
<<< Part 2a: Australia’s Essential Eight: Beyond Endpoint Control <<< Part 2b: Activating UK NCSC & US NIST Guidelines: Beyond Endpoint Control Part 4: Systematic Measurement of Cyber Controls >>> As much as we invest into cyber security controls, external threats are inevitable. In a recent Notifiable Data Breaches Report from the Office of the […]Read more
Keen campers, scouts and even the Swiss Army know – that a good penknife is indispensable. This simple device has mitigated many a disaster at one point in time or another. Whether it’s to cut through a bit of string, tighten a screw or simply to solve the problem of no bottle opener in the […]Read more
Supply chain risk is an area of cyber security that demands the ongoing attention of every enterprise; because it can make the difference between being resilient or not. It’s no surprise that insurers warn that the vulnerability of supply chains is potentially a systemic risk that can quickly propagate across supply chain dominated industries. Organisations […]Read more
It took a “tripartite cyber assessment” by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) to identify that a sample of financial organisations had inadequate cyber security: poor security control management, a lack of business recovery planning and inadequate 3rd party risk assessment. Why were there gaps? Where is the failure? Clearly the common practice of unsubstantiated […]Read more
The discussion over data-driven vs qualitative cyber security assessment has been going for some time. Nowadays, it is at the top of the priority list for many security and senior executive teams. Managing cyber security has always been a noble ambition but without reliable measurement, the lack of actionable information makes evidence-based management decisions almost […]Read more
Attack Surface Management (ASM) characterises a business’s security risks as the monitoring and risk mitigation of a constantly changing and vulnerable “risk-surface”. Importantly, this attack surface extends to both internal and external assets and services. Some ASM solutions deliver clear visibility across both Internet facing and internal assets. Others do not. Instead, they assess external […]Read more
The UK Government has released its annual “Cyber Security Breaches Survey 2023”. It provides some valuable insights into how cyber security is currently being managed in the UK, by a range of organisations. It also speaks to how current competing economic priorities are impacting the effectiveness of some cyber security management efforts. The full report […]Read more
Solving the mismatch between cyber security reporting and directors’ requirements You are undoubtedly familiar with the headlines; you may have even become in part desensitised to them: ‘Cyber-attacks are increasingly damaging’, or ‘large amounts of personal data are most at risk’. The important take-away, however, is that modern day thieves can easily gain access to […]Read more
A system to address the untrustworthy security environment Zero trust approaches to security have been talked about for a while; but in recent times they have certainly gained more currency. As a model for protecting data and services, the simplicity of the concept is its biggest strength – assume, as a default position, there is […]Read more
The ongoing protection of Critical Infrastructure from cyber-attacks has implications for us all – whether it’s supporting our health, well-being or simply our way of life, there is good reason to reflect on the effectiveness your cyber security. Cyber security risks are nothing new and the vulnerability of critical infrastructure to them (and the heightened […]Read more
Read by directors, executives, and security professionals globally, operating in the most complex of security environments.