Our cyber security products span from our next gen SIEM used in the most secure government and critical infrastructure environments, to automated cyber risk reporting applications for commercial and government organisations of all sizes.
One of the key learnings coming out of the Australian Banking Royal Commission for Directors, Executives, and staff who report up to the Board, centred around the need for the governance-layer of an organisation to see verifiable proof of compliance across the organisation, and not just to assume that existing policies and processes imply alignment and fulfilment. This is equally relevant for cyber security.
This is not a “set and forget” mindset toward results and activity, this represents an active engagement with actual results that can be tracked and reviewed at any point in time, as well as trend-analysed over longer periods. Are the current policies and procedures achieving the strategic objectives?
The expectation of verifiable proof of your organisation’s cyber security health and wellbeing should take the same approach too, as it has emerged as another vital component of risk management and business continuity planning.
In his book Great by Choice, business leader Jim Collins notes that good leaders continually ask “What if?”. By preparing ahead of time, building reserves, preserving a margin of safety, bounding risk, and honing their disciplines in good times and bad, they handle disruptions from a point of strength and flexibility.
This is not just wise advice from a researcher who focusses on business stability and growth, it’s likely the kind of risk-management thinking that has already prompted your organisation to choose to invest in insurance cover, amongst other mitigation strategies, since its inception.
As cyber-risk has now become a regular discussion item under the risk agenda of small and large organisations, the question to ask is whether your organisation has cyber-attack prevention, containment and recovery thinking embedded in how it measures this type of risk, and whether your executives and board have a regular line of sight to this information. In fact, in its November 2021 Insight publication – Improving Cyber Resilience, the Australian prudential regulator recommends that directors review and challenge [the quality of] the cyber information they receive from management – to assist mutual understanding.
Whether you are based in the APAC region, in the UK or USA, ideally, you should be expecting regular governance-level proof that your cyber security measures are strong (or proof that there are methods in place to identify gaps, and then apply a fix). No doubt, as your team add this to their daily and weekly agenda, they’d appreciate a management process that minimises added costs and disruption, that still produces high fidelity in reporting.
If your executive, board and staff already have a culture that reflects sound risk management and business continuity thinking, you’re already ahead of the game when it comes to insurance renewal time.
Unless you’ve been off-grid for the last 12-months, you’ll know that globally there was an 105% increase in ransomware attacks from 2020 to 2021, that included double and triple attacks, according to the 2022 SonicWall Cyber Threat Report. Right now, we’re experiencing a slight hiatus in this trend but just as extreme weather conditions and natural disasters have an impact on the cost of insurance, cyber security effectiveness and coverage face the same rules.
Cyber insurance cover and renewal has become harder, but it is possible to navigate, by utilising cyber insurance renewal tools, that also have the side-benefit of strengthening your risk readiness and your organisation’s cyber maturity.
The insurance industry is looking closely at ways to improve the quality of the security risk information they receive. Improved risk information means better pricing of risk, and proven tools, like Huntsman Security’s Essential 8 Auditor or SmartCheck, measure and verify an organisation’s cyber security posture, and:
Returning to the concept of ‘proof’, we know that it needs to be something that is supported with real data. We know underwriters and insurers more generally are seeking to improve their loss ratios, and better-quality cyber security risk information is a key part of that. Knowing the effectiveness of the risks covered greatly assists in understanding the remaining or residual risk yet to be mitigated. In the reality of busy workplaces, the limitations on finding skilled staff in this tight job market, and when organisations now need to account for every device (that might include legacy machines, that lie forgotten in an office), automation of data collection is a key enabler to what can be an unending task.
With the Huntsman Security Essential 8 Auditor or SmartCheck option, organisations are finding that because it is benchmarked against the ACSC Essential Eight framework or the NCSC Ransomware mitigation guidance, it provides accurate and timely cyber maturity measurement. As a result, it provides underwriters and insurers with an evidence-based measure of the state of your security controls and the residual risks to be underwritten. In the event of an insurance claim (the driving reason behind why organisations cover their risks with insurance), insurers are increasingly seeking to verify that the agreed mitigation activities were exercised as part of the ongoing operations of the business. They will often look for:
A recent KPMG Report suggests that protecting against and dealing with cyber risks will be the major challenge for senior executives in 2024. It is clear that despite high levels of security investment, organisations continue to suffer from cyber attacks.Read more
The Australian Signals Directorate’s (ASD) recent publication of their Cyber Threat Report 2022-2023 unearthed a range of areas for concern for government departments and critical infrastructure entities at local, State and Federal level.Read more
As cyber risks increase, organisations are encountering the longer life cycle of insurance renewals and the need to demonstrate better management of security controls and their effectiveness.Read more
Highlights and insights from the recent Managed Services Summit in London & the ISACA Central Chapter Conference on Digital Trust, in Birmingham, UK. With two recent conferences in the space of three days, some interesting challenges were very evident in the topics discussed. Being very different events, the challenges were quite different, but interestingly they […]Read more
In early August 2023, the latest joint advisory on persistent vulnerabilities was issued by the intelligence and security agencies of the “Five-eyes” community. These joint advisories are becoming more common. Perhaps recognising the growing importance of shared security information and the common nature of many of the threats faced – the weight they carry makes […]Read more
The quality of your risk assessment and the security information it provides is important; if you plan to use it to actively manage your operational and cyber resilience activities. Organisations are constantly exposed to a rapidly changing threat environment, so you really need a similarly rapid evidence-based feedback system that informs you of the ongoing […]Read more
The UK market has its own regulators, security standards and challenges. And while rulings from SEC in the US or the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) in Australia don’t apply to UK companies, for the most part, the observations are undoubtedly relevant and the resulting advice instructive. It would be wrong to think UK financial […]Read more
<<< Part 2a: Australia’s Essential Eight: Beyond Endpoint Control <<< Part 2b: Activating UK NCSC & US NIST Guidelines: Beyond Endpoint Control Part 4: Systematic Measurement of Cyber Controls >>> As much as we invest into cyber security controls, external threats are inevitable. In a recent Notifiable Data Breaches Report from the Office of the […]Read more
Keen campers, scouts and even the Swiss Army know – that a good penknife is indispensable. This simple device has mitigated many a disaster at one point in time or another. Whether it’s to cut through a bit of string, tighten a screw or simply to solve the problem of no bottle opener in the […]Read more
Supply chain risk is an area of cyber security that demands the ongoing attention of every enterprise; because it can make the difference between being resilient or not. It’s no surprise that insurers warn that the vulnerability of supply chains is potentially a systemic risk that can quickly propagate across supply chain dominated industries. Organisations […]Read more
Read by directors, executives, and security professionals globally, operating in the most complex of security environments.