Our cyber security products span from our next gen SIEM used in the most secure government and critical infrastructure environments, to automated cyber risk reporting applications for commercial and government organisations of all sizes.
One of the key learnings coming out of the Australian Banking Royal Commission for Directors, Executives, and staff who report up to the Board, centred around the need for the governance-layer of an organisation to see verifiable proof of compliance across the organisation, and not just to assume that existing policies and processes imply alignment and fulfilment. This is equally relevant for cyber security.
This is not a “set and forget” mindset toward results and activity, this represents an active engagement with actual results that can be tracked and reviewed at any point in time, as well as trend-analysed over longer periods. Are the current policies and procedures achieving the strategic objectives?
The expectation of verifiable proof of your organisation’s cyber security health and wellbeing should take the same approach too, as it has emerged as another vital component of risk management and business continuity planning.
In his book Great by Choice, business leader Jim Collins notes that good leaders continually ask “What if?”. By preparing ahead of time, building reserves, preserving a margin of safety, bounding risk, and honing their disciplines in good times and bad, they handle disruptions from a point of strength and flexibility.
This is not just wise advice from a researcher who focusses on business stability and growth, it’s likely the kind of risk-management thinking that has already prompted your organisation to choose to invest in insurance cover, amongst other mitigation strategies, since its inception.
As cyber-risk has now become a regular discussion item under the risk agenda of small and large organisations, the question to ask is whether your organisation has cyber-attack prevention, containment and recovery thinking embedded in how it measures this type of risk, and whether your executives and board have a regular line of sight to this information. In fact, in its November 2021 Insight publication – Improving Cyber Resilience, the Australian prudential regulator recommends that directors review and challenge [the quality of] the cyber information they receive from management – to assist mutual understanding.
Whether you are based in the APAC region, in the UK or USA, ideally, you should be expecting regular governance-level proof that your cyber security measures are strong (or proof that there are methods in place to identify gaps, and then apply a fix). No doubt, as your team add this to their daily and weekly agenda, they’d appreciate a management process that minimises added costs and disruption, that still produces high fidelity in reporting.
If your executive, board and staff already have a culture that reflects sound risk management and business continuity thinking, you’re already ahead of the game when it comes to insurance renewal time.
Unless you’ve been off-grid for the last 12-months, you’ll know that globally there was an 105% increase in ransomware attacks from 2020 to 2021, that included double and triple attacks, according to the 2022 SonicWall Cyber Threat Report. Right now, we’re experiencing a slight hiatus in this trend but just as extreme weather conditions and natural disasters have an impact on the cost of insurance, cyber security effectiveness and coverage face the same rules.
Cyber insurance cover and renewal has become harder, but it is possible to navigate, by utilising cyber insurance renewal tools, that also have the side-benefit of strengthening your risk readiness and your organisation’s cyber maturity.
The insurance industry is looking closely at ways to improve the quality of the security risk information they receive. Improved risk information means better pricing of risk, and proven tools, like Huntsman Security’s Essential 8 Auditor or SmartCheck, measure and verify an organisation’s cyber security posture, and:
Returning to the concept of ‘proof’, we know that it needs to be something that is supported with real data. We know underwriters and insurers more generally are seeking to improve their loss ratios, and better-quality cyber security risk information is a key part of that. Knowing the effectiveness of the risks covered greatly assists in understanding the remaining or residual risk yet to be mitigated. In the reality of busy workplaces, the limitations on finding skilled staff in this tight job market, and when organisations now need to account for every device (that might include legacy machines, that lie forgotten in an office), automation of data collection is a key enabler to what can be an unending task.
With the Huntsman Security Essential 8 Auditor or SmartCheck option, organisations are finding that because it is benchmarked against the ACSC Essential Eight framework or the NCSC Ransomware mitigation guidance, it provides accurate and timely cyber maturity measurement. As a result, it provides underwriters and insurers with an evidence-based measure of the state of your security controls and the residual risks to be underwritten. In the event of an insurance claim (the driving reason behind why organisations cover their risks with insurance), insurers are increasingly seeking to verify that the agreed mitigation activities were exercised as part of the ongoing operations of the business. They will often look for:
<<< Part 2a: Australia’s Essential Eight: Beyond Endpoint Control <<< Part 2b: Activating UK NCSC & US NIST Guidelines: Beyond Endpoint Control Part 4: Systematic Measurement of Cyber Controls >>> As much as we invest into cyber security controls, external threats are inevitable. In a recent Notifiable Data Breaches Report from the Office of the […]Read more
Keen campers, scouts and even the Swiss Army know – that a good penknife is indispensable. This simple device has mitigated many a disaster at one point in time or another. Whether it’s to cut through a bit of string, tighten a screw or simply to solve the problem of no bottle opener in the […]Read more
Supply chain risk is an area of cyber security that demands the ongoing attention of every enterprise; because it can make the difference between being resilient or not. It’s no surprise that insurers warn that the vulnerability of supply chains is potentially a systemic risk that can quickly propagate across supply chain dominated industries. Organisations […]Read more
It took a “tripartite cyber assessment” by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) to identify that a sample of financial organisations had inadequate cyber security: poor security control management, a lack of business recovery planning and inadequate 3rd party risk assessment. Why were there gaps? Where is the failure? Clearly the common practice of unsubstantiated […]Read more
The discussion over data-driven vs qualitative cyber security assessment has been going for some time. Nowadays, it is at the top of the priority list for many security and senior executive teams. Managing cyber security has always been a noble ambition but without reliable measurement, the lack of actionable information makes evidence-based management decisions almost […]Read more
Attack Surface Management (ASM) characterises a business’s security risks as the monitoring and risk mitigation of a constantly changing and vulnerable “risk-surface”. Importantly, this attack surface extends to both internal and external assets and services. Some ASM solutions deliver clear visibility across both Internet facing and internal assets. Others do not. Instead, they assess external […]Read more
The UK Government has released its annual “Cyber Security Breaches Survey 2023”. It provides some valuable insights into how cyber security is currently being managed in the UK, by a range of organisations. It also speaks to how current competing economic priorities are impacting the effectiveness of some cyber security management efforts. The full report […]Read more
Solving the mismatch between cyber security reporting and directors’ requirements You are undoubtedly familiar with the headlines; you may have even become in part desensitised to them: ‘Cyber-attacks are increasingly damaging’, or ‘large amounts of personal data are most at risk’. The important take-away, however, is that modern day thieves can easily gain access to […]Read more
A system to address the untrustworthy security environment Zero trust approaches to security have been talked about for a while; but in recent times they have certainly gained more currency. As a model for protecting data and services, the simplicity of the concept is its biggest strength – assume, as a default position, there is […]Read more
The ongoing protection of Critical Infrastructure from cyber-attacks has implications for us all – whether it’s supporting our health, well-being or simply our way of life, there is good reason to reflect on the effectiveness your cyber security. Cyber security risks are nothing new and the vulnerability of critical infrastructure to them (and the heightened […]Read more
Read by directors, executives, and security professionals globally, operating in the most complex of security environments.