Our cyber security products span from our next gen SIEM used in the most secure government and critical infrastructure environments, to automated cyber risk reporting applications for commercial and government organisations of all sizes.
Zero trust approaches to security have been talked about for a while; but in recent times they have certainly gained more currency. As a model for protecting data and services, the simplicity of the concept is its biggest strength – assume, as a default position, there is no implicit security or trust in the environment, network or the perimeter itself. Protecting the data while minimising how users’ access and interact with it is important. So too, is the establishment and regular monitoring of the operation and effectiveness of security controls to detect and mitigate threats, misuse and attacks and improve security posture.
Forrester – a long-time advocate of this approach – define it in this way:
Zero Trust is an information security model that denies access to applications and data by default. Threat prevention is achieved by only granting access to networks and workloads utilizing policy informed by continuous, contextual, and risk-based verification across users and associated devices. Zero Trust advocates these three core principles: All entities are untrusted by default, least privilege access is enforced, and comprehensive security monitoring is implemented.
The high echelons of government have now recognised the importance of zero trust, with the US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) requiring/recommending it and the Executive Order from 12/5/2021 mandating it:
The Federal Government must adopt security best practices; advance toward Zero Trust Architecture; accelerate movement to secure cloud services, including Software as a Service (SaaS), Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS), and Platform as a Service (PaaS); centralize and streamline access to cybersecurity data to drive analytics for identifying and managing cybersecurity risks; and invest in both technology and personnel to match these modernization goals.
There is almost universal acknowledgement that the principles and practices of zero trust can reduce cyber security risk and improve organisational governance. The integration of the concepts and ideas that form the basis of zero trust are increasingly well articulated and understood.
In April 2023, for example, CISA released their latest Zero Trust Maturity Model (ZTMM) V2.0. It builds on NIST SP 800-207 Zero Trust Architecture, to provide examples of how organisations can progressively implement increasingly sophisticated zero trust architectures.
Key to this are 5 pillars or inter-dependant security elements:
The model anticipates the phased maturity of each of the pillars (Traditional – Optimal) with increasing automation and inter-dependence of processes and systems within and, ultimately, across the pillars. It provides guidance for the progressive integration of activities across the pillars – the “3 cross-cutting capabilities” – Visibility and Analytics, Automation and Orchestration, and Governance, and specifies the progressive sophistication of each phase (Visibility and Analytics – Automation and Orchestration – Governance).
Recent Forrester research has shown (as reported here, and in its original form here) that two thirds of European security leaders have started down the zero trust path. Interestingly, those that have encountered security problems in the past appear the most likely to turn to zero trust to guide their future security and risk management efforts.
The adoption of zero trust, however, is not without its pitfalls. For example, the complexities of user and identity management and the need to monitor user activities, with a degree of granularity, can run counter to culture, privacy and employment principles in some jurisdictions.
Adopting zero trust doesn’t mean that you can dispense with conventional controls, it simply means that you can better protect your data, with them. Knowing the effectiveness of your security controls, and so the risk of their failure, will help inform the risk mitigation strategies and assist your cyber resilience efforts. This is not a dissimilar strategy to that taken by the ACSC in Australia when they launched their Essential Eight security framework to improve cyber resilience.
Monitoring security within a zero trust framework can be complex and disruptive. There are numerous sources of activity data to collect and analyse. Even a simple activity on the system can result in a multiplicity of event logs for interpretation and response. The case for automated data-driven monitoring, analysis and reporting is clear.
Picking even simple use cases for security monitoring, such as tracking application use, could in some workplaces fall foul of employee rights to privacy. Security demands and HR issues rub up against one another. The security function, stripped of its reliance on network or perimeter logs, expects to gain adequate intelligence from end-point or application activity. At the same time, a user expects that they can carry out their duties without undue scrutiny or oversight.
Aside from those sectors or industries where adoption is suggested, encouraged or even mandated, the question for the organisation (from the business to the technology teams) might be “what do you gain from all this?”.
There are a number of benefits, but primarily:
Monitoring might be hard to do and tricky to balance in reality, but it really does give better visibility of external threats and misuse, as well as a greater ability to understand and diagnose a problem, as it occurs. Having a data-driven and reliable source of security information on which to base your security decision-making, is fundamental to good governance and oversight.
COVID-19 led many companies to move their IT assets and systems into the cloud as they switched to home working. The tenets of zero trust as defined in NIST SP 800-207, with the presumption of no implicit security or trust in the environment, network or the perimeter, supports the security integrity of new or unmanaged endpoints, servers hosted in the cloud and internet-based applications. With the diminution of the security perimeter most business processes oriented around remote or hybrid working and cloud IT delivery need this flexibility which appears here to stay.
There are certainly challenges as organisations progress their zero trust maturity from a Traditional to Optimal state. But the benefits of more responsive cyber security architectures to meet the needs of the modern business operating in riskier threat environments are clear.
Zero trust also allows for a long overdue recalibration of cyber security theory and practice. By automating data-driven collection and analysis, cyber security stakeholders can visualise and integrate this dynamic security information into their risk management and governance decision-making.
The UK market has its own regulators, security standards and challenges. And while rulings from SEC in the US or the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) in Australia don’t apply to UK companies, for the most part, the observations are undoubtedly relevant and the resulting advice instructive. It would be wrong to think UK financial […]Read more
<<< Part 2a: Australia’s Essential Eight: Beyond Endpoint Control <<< Part 2b: Activating UK NCSC & US NIST Guidelines: Beyond Endpoint Control Part 4: Systematic Measurement of Cyber Controls >>> As much as we invest into cyber security controls, external threats are inevitable. In a recent Notifiable Data Breaches Report from the Office of the […]Read more
Keen campers, scouts and even the Swiss Army know – that a good penknife is indispensable. This simple device has mitigated many a disaster at one point in time or another. Whether it’s to cut through a bit of string, tighten a screw or simply to solve the problem of no bottle opener in the […]Read more
Supply chain risk is an area of cyber security that demands the ongoing attention of every enterprise; because it can make the difference between being resilient or not. It’s no surprise that insurers warn that the vulnerability of supply chains is potentially a systemic risk that can quickly propagate across supply chain dominated industries. Organisations […]Read more
It took a “tripartite cyber assessment” by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) to identify that a sample of financial organisations had inadequate cyber security: poor security control management, a lack of business recovery planning and inadequate 3rd party risk assessment. Why were there gaps? Where is the failure? Clearly the common practice of unsubstantiated […]Read more
The discussion over data-driven vs qualitative cyber security assessment has been going for some time. Nowadays, it is at the top of the priority list for many security and senior executive teams. Managing cyber security has always been a noble ambition but without reliable measurement, the lack of actionable information makes evidence-based management decisions almost […]Read more
Attack Surface Management (ASM) characterises a business’s security risks as the monitoring and risk mitigation of a constantly changing and vulnerable “risk-surface”. Importantly, this attack surface extends to both internal and external assets and services. Some ASM solutions deliver clear visibility across both Internet facing and internal assets. Others do not. Instead, they assess external […]Read more
The UK Government has released its annual “Cyber Security Breaches Survey 2023”. It provides some valuable insights into how cyber security is currently being managed in the UK, by a range of organisations. It also speaks to how current competing economic priorities are impacting the effectiveness of some cyber security management efforts. The full report […]Read more
Solving the mismatch between cyber security reporting and directors’ requirements You are undoubtedly familiar with the headlines; you may have even become in part desensitised to them: ‘Cyber-attacks are increasingly damaging’, or ‘large amounts of personal data are most at risk’. The important take-away, however, is that modern day thieves can easily gain access to […]Read more
The ongoing protection of Critical Infrastructure from cyber-attacks has implications for us all – whether it’s supporting our health, well-being or simply our way of life, there is good reason to reflect on the effectiveness your cyber security. Cyber security risks are nothing new and the vulnerability of critical infrastructure to them (and the heightened […]Read more
Read by directors, executives, and security professionals globally, operating in the most complex of security environments.