Our cyber security products span from our next gen SIEM used in the most secure government and critical infrastructure environments, to automated cyber risk reporting applications for commercial and government organisations of all sizes.
The MITRE Corporation released ATT&CK (Adversarial Tactics, Techniques and Common Knowledge) in 2013. It is a list of adversarial exploits and techniques that provide a knowledge base for security teams to defend themselves against the most complex and advanced persistent threats (APTs). This blog post gives an overview of the framework.
There are a number of matrices, including: Enterprise, Mobile, PRE-ATT&CK and ICS for industrial control systems. Each one of these contains a structured list of known attacker behaviours that have been compiled into tactics and techniques; the tactics are ‘what’ attackers are seeking to achieve and the techniques are the ‘how’ (including mitigation and remediation strategies).
There are 11 tactic categories within the Mitre Attack Framework, each with a ‘current’ list of known techniques that have been observed to have been carried out by adversaries. The image below gives an indication of any attacker’s list of objectives and strategies to achieve them.
MITRE ATT&CK Matrix – tactics
The latest MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Matrix can be found on The MITRE Corporation’s website here: https://attack.mitre.org/matrices/enterprise/
There is a large number of strategies that have been developed to mitigate the known adversarial tactics and techniques of APT attacks. The latest published list contains 41 enterprise level mitigation strategies, an excerpt of which is here:
Excerpt from The MITRE Corporation’s list of enterprise mitigations
A full list of MITRE ATT&CK enterprise matrix mitigation strategies can be found on The MITRE Corporation’s website here: https://attack.mitre.org/mitigations/enterprise/
If you are embarking on the implementation of MITRE ATT&CK mitigation strategies, you are most likely already functioning at the vanguard of defence grade cyber security, operating threat hunting and red team / penetration testing activities; the matrices require the commitment of significant resources and skill to establish and maintain the strategies. If you’d like to explore how Huntsman Security can support you with this, please don’t hesitate to contact us using the link below.
Regardless of whether you are ready for one of the MITRE ATT&CK matrices or not, it’s worth checking to see if your operation has the fundamental security controls in place and operating effectively. If you have missing patches on systems, weak passwords on standard accounts, or users willing to click on links that point to malware – you are giving an attacker a choice of which point of failure to exploit. For organisations where cyber security is critical there is another dimension to consider – compromises in fundamental cyber hygiene are the entry point for more complex and advanced cyber-attacks.
Focusing on cyber hygiene doesn’t mean ignoring the bigger issues. Rather, it is about making sure you have the most common access points covered and maintained.
Determining what the cyber hygiene fundamentals are varies according to the source of the advice. The Australian Government recognised this challenge and devised a security framework, the ACSC Essential Eight, that distils the wide range of published security controls down to the most critical and universally recognised; they deliver the biggest ‘bang for your buck’ in terms of defending networks from cyber threats and provide an excellent cyber resilience baseline for all organisations. In the UK, Cyber Essentials, the UK Government information assurance scheme, comprises a framework of five mitigation controls.
A key benefit of implementing and maintaining critical security controls is that the effective management of each of them will successfully simplify the number of MITRE ATT&CK Matrix techniques that require bespoke risk mitigation efforts.
Regardless of your organisation’s current cyber maturity level, benchmarking your performance against a small number of critical security controls is fundamental to establishing, developing and maintaining cyber resilience.
The UK market has its own regulators, security standards and challenges. And while rulings from SEC in the US or the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) in Australia don’t apply to UK companies, for the most part, the observations are undoubtedly relevant and the resulting advice instructive. It would be wrong to think UK financial […]Read more
<<< Part 2a: Australia’s Essential Eight: Beyond Endpoint Control <<< Part 2b: Activating UK NCSC & US NIST Guidelines: Beyond Endpoint Control Part 4: Systematic Measurement of Cyber Controls >>> As much as we invest into cyber security controls, external threats are inevitable. In a recent Notifiable Data Breaches Report from the Office of the […]Read more
Keen campers, scouts and even the Swiss Army know – that a good penknife is indispensable. This simple device has mitigated many a disaster at one point in time or another. Whether it’s to cut through a bit of string, tighten a screw or simply to solve the problem of no bottle opener in the […]Read more
Supply chain risk is an area of cyber security that demands the ongoing attention of every enterprise; because it can make the difference between being resilient or not. It’s no surprise that insurers warn that the vulnerability of supply chains is potentially a systemic risk that can quickly propagate across supply chain dominated industries. Organisations […]Read more
It took a “tripartite cyber assessment” by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) to identify that a sample of financial organisations had inadequate cyber security: poor security control management, a lack of business recovery planning and inadequate 3rd party risk assessment. Why were there gaps? Where is the failure? Clearly the common practice of unsubstantiated […]Read more
The discussion over data-driven vs qualitative cyber security assessment has been going for some time. Nowadays, it is at the top of the priority list for many security and senior executive teams. Managing cyber security has always been a noble ambition but without reliable measurement, the lack of actionable information makes evidence-based management decisions almost […]Read more
Attack Surface Management (ASM) characterises a business’s security risks as the monitoring and risk mitigation of a constantly changing and vulnerable “risk-surface”. Importantly, this attack surface extends to both internal and external assets and services. Some ASM solutions deliver clear visibility across both Internet facing and internal assets. Others do not. Instead, they assess external […]Read more
The UK Government has released its annual “Cyber Security Breaches Survey 2023”. It provides some valuable insights into how cyber security is currently being managed in the UK, by a range of organisations. It also speaks to how current competing economic priorities are impacting the effectiveness of some cyber security management efforts. The full report […]Read more
Solving the mismatch between cyber security reporting and directors’ requirements You are undoubtedly familiar with the headlines; you may have even become in part desensitised to them: ‘Cyber-attacks are increasingly damaging’, or ‘large amounts of personal data are most at risk’. The important take-away, however, is that modern day thieves can easily gain access to […]Read more
A system to address the untrustworthy security environment Zero trust approaches to security have been talked about for a while; but in recent times they have certainly gained more currency. As a model for protecting data and services, the simplicity of the concept is its biggest strength – assume, as a default position, there is […]Read more
Read by directors, executives, and security professionals globally, operating in the most complex of security environments.