Our cyber security products span from our next gen SIEM used in the most secure government and critical infrastructure environments, to automated cyber risk reporting applications for commercial and government organisations of all sizes.
Few organisations have the resilience to suffer a cyberattack as large as the one the Australian National University (ANU) notified last week. Data breaches of this magnitude certainly take their toll, and in this case the ANU will be feeling the pain for some time to come. But what happened and how can organisations better prepare themselves for this kind of attack?
Apparently up to 19 years’ worth of personally identifiable data about ANU’s students, staff and visitors was stolen in this breach. Records include names, addresses, phone numbers, dates of birth, email addresses, tax file numbers and even bank account details, not to mention passport details and student academic records. ANU’s Vice Chancellor, Brian Schmidt, said in an open letter on their website, that the breach occurred towards the end of 2018, yet was only detected in May of this year. That is a very long time for a hacker to remain undetected, yet it is not as unusual as you would like to think.
The dwell time of a cyber intruder is a metric used to describe how long an adversary goes undetected on your network once they have found a way in. In 2018, a study by the Ponemon Institute found the average dwell time is 196 days, which means the attacker has on average around half a year to look around for data, monitor how the organisation operates and cover their tracks. Moreover, even when threats are detected, it takes a further 69 days to respond (Ponemon Institute).
So how can organisations better defend against sophisticated attacks to reduce the time from infection to detection, and detection to response?
Most organisations have information that should be secured, be it customer data, IP or commercial data. Cyber criminals can monetise all that data, while nation states may be seeking a commercial or economic advantage, or a national security edge. To counteract this kind of continued barrage of cyber-attacks, there are considerations business leaders should be aware of that provide options to manage these risks.
Firstly, auditing is the practice of reviewing who has accessed what information, making sure that only those who should be interacting with certain kinds of data have been accessing it. Interestingly, in describing auditing, notice that it relates to a point in time. Auditing is typically a retrospective process and audits are usually scheduled activities that review how the organisation was operating at that point in time and suggests improvements should issues be found. Organisations should always have an audit function as part of their corporate governance. This isn’t about being proactive, but it puts the next controls we will discuss into a reviewable schedule and focuses the security team’s efforts over extended cycles where improvements and issues can be easily measured, highlighted then improved.
“Accounting” is a real-time function where your systems and processes ensure they record who has accessed what. This accounting information is used by your audit team to review who has been accessing what data and systems. But this accounting information can also be intercepted in real-time to help detect unauthorised access as it happens, so cutting that dwell time down to a less dangerous level. Systems should be set up to produce as much accounting information as is useful to your needs – luckily most modern systems can produce copious volumes of logging, so you’ll have no issue generating this data. The bigger question is, what can you do with all that data?
Monitoring and compliance are the two most important parts of your defensive strategy that should be prioritised. Once you are sure you are producing all necessary accounting information, you’ll need a means of triaging that data and identifying issues. This is where a Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) system comes in; it ingests logs from any kind of data source, be it a network device, operating systems or application. Log data is then passed to a machine learning system and correlation engine to detect patterns of activity or behaviours that are suspicious, alerting on any potentially nefarious behaviour to your security team.
Next Generation SIEM products have built-in behavioural anomaly detection (BAD or UEBA) that can also look for unusual patterns of activity that might otherwise appear unthreatening. For example, an administrator who changes working hours to coming in at night, could be indicative of an account breach, or might mean the administrator’s personal circumstances have changed, which might also be a threat.
Next Generation SIEM plus security orchestration and automated response (SOAR) brings an even more powerful and unique response capability – it reduces the time from threat detection to response. The technology automatically verifies threats to reduce the number of false positives left for analysts to investigate.
Compliance in its traditional form is closely associated with auditing – auditing against specific external standards. However, the principles of compliance can be applied to the day to day management of an organisation’s performance to improve cyber resilience and reduce risk.
There are monitoring technologies available today that have changed the meaning of compliance to align with real-time monitoring, insomuch that you can receive an immediate alert when the measure of a security control’s effectiveness changes or degrades. Scorecard capabilities do a high-level wrap-up of all the systems sitting behind a security control’s requirement, to represent them in a way that can be quickly interpreted. The detail relating to individual systems is sent to the relevant operational team, but the imperative to be compliant at the organisational level can drive the prioritisation of work, based on management’s understanding of what’s most important to their organisation.
Organisations should not wait until they are breached to begin a security improvement project – it can take just one breach to see your organisation go from thriving to crippled.
By taking an holistic, continuous approach to auditing, accounting, monitoring, alerting and compliance, your organisation can maintain its long term security goals, demonstrate adherence to external regulatory frameworks, while detecting even the most complex of threats. Be proactive… reduce the dwell time of your organisation.
The UK market has its own regulators, security standards and challenges. And while rulings from SEC in the US or the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) in Australia don’t apply to UK companies, for the most part, the observations are undoubtedly relevant and the resulting advice instructive. It would be wrong to think UK financial […]Read more
<<< Part 2a: Australia’s Essential Eight: Beyond Endpoint Control <<< Part 2b: Activating UK NCSC & US NIST Guidelines: Beyond Endpoint Control Part 4: Systematic Measurement of Cyber Controls >>> As much as we invest into cyber security controls, external threats are inevitable. In a recent Notifiable Data Breaches Report from the Office of the […]Read more
Keen campers, scouts and even the Swiss Army know – that a good penknife is indispensable. This simple device has mitigated many a disaster at one point in time or another. Whether it’s to cut through a bit of string, tighten a screw or simply to solve the problem of no bottle opener in the […]Read more
Supply chain risk is an area of cyber security that demands the ongoing attention of every enterprise; because it can make the difference between being resilient or not. It’s no surprise that insurers warn that the vulnerability of supply chains is potentially a systemic risk that can quickly propagate across supply chain dominated industries. Organisations […]Read more
It took a “tripartite cyber assessment” by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) to identify that a sample of financial organisations had inadequate cyber security: poor security control management, a lack of business recovery planning and inadequate 3rd party risk assessment. Why were there gaps? Where is the failure? Clearly the common practice of unsubstantiated […]Read more
The discussion over data-driven vs qualitative cyber security assessment has been going for some time. Nowadays, it is at the top of the priority list for many security and senior executive teams. Managing cyber security has always been a noble ambition but without reliable measurement, the lack of actionable information makes evidence-based management decisions almost […]Read more
Attack Surface Management (ASM) characterises a business’s security risks as the monitoring and risk mitigation of a constantly changing and vulnerable “risk-surface”. Importantly, this attack surface extends to both internal and external assets and services. Some ASM solutions deliver clear visibility across both Internet facing and internal assets. Others do not. Instead, they assess external […]Read more
The UK Government has released its annual “Cyber Security Breaches Survey 2023”. It provides some valuable insights into how cyber security is currently being managed in the UK, by a range of organisations. It also speaks to how current competing economic priorities are impacting the effectiveness of some cyber security management efforts. The full report […]Read more
Solving the mismatch between cyber security reporting and directors’ requirements You are undoubtedly familiar with the headlines; you may have even become in part desensitised to them: ‘Cyber-attacks are increasingly damaging’, or ‘large amounts of personal data are most at risk’. The important take-away, however, is that modern day thieves can easily gain access to […]Read more
A system to address the untrustworthy security environment Zero trust approaches to security have been talked about for a while; but in recent times they have certainly gained more currency. As a model for protecting data and services, the simplicity of the concept is its biggest strength – assume, as a default position, there is […]Read more
Read by directors, executives, and security professionals globally, operating in the most complex of security environments.