Our cyber security products span from our next gen SIEM used in the most secure government and critical infrastructure environments, to automated cyber risk reporting applications for commercial and government organisations of all sizes.
The Australian Signals Directorate (ASD) published a list of prioritised cyber mitigation strategies in February 2017 that they claim will protect organisations against as many as 85% of targeted cyber-attacks. Known as the ASD Essential Eight, there is no doubt in anyone’s mind that these controls can reduce security incidents. Multi-factor authentication (MFA) is one of these eight controls, where ASD says multiple levels of authentication make it much more difficult for attackers to hijack a user’s account.
Passwords are ubiquitous as a form of authenticating a user’s identity but for some time have also been seen as one of the weakest aspects of an organisation’s security architecture. There is also a misconception that additional levels of authentication, such as integration of RSA Tokens or Smartcards into the authentication mechanism will add significant cost. However, MFA ensures the user is granted access only after presenting multiple, separate credentials, usually from multiple categories, thus significantly improving the overall efficacy of the authentication service. MFA services are often split into the following three categories:
Something you know (password)
Something you have (token)
Something you are (fingerprint, iris scan, facial recognition)
Multi-Factor Authentication solutions incorporate something you know with something you have or something you are, to have the user present two or even three separate credentials to the authenticating system. Even social media services and email providers these days, such as Microsoft, Apple and Google, are incorporating MFA into their architecture to protect their users from account hijacking. It’s time that MFA was considered a mandatory component of security architecture rather than optional. Let’s look at MFA in more detail.
During an attack, hackers will attempt to steal a user’s authentication information (username and password). The ultimate prize is to bag an administrative account with full privileges – of course, adversaries will settle for access to a standard user account, especially if it is a high-value user such as a financial controller or executive. Once an attacker gains access to a legitimate account, in most cases, all bets are off. Few organisations configure logging and auditing systems to monitor real users going about their normal business, so the attacker can start canvassing the network, looking for ways to monetise their new-found freedom on your systems.
Caution: Multi-factor authentication is often confused with multi-step authentication. Don’t be led into a false sense of security by thinking a second level of authentication into an application server (for example) provides the same level of protection as MFA. Sequentially authenticating to multiple authentication providers will still leave any one of those functions open to brute force attacks or replay attacks.
There are dozens of Multi-factor authentication solutions on the market and it’s really a matter of picking the one that best suits your business needs. Remote access is often the place where businesses start incorporating MFA into their architecture, since remote access solutions open up an attack vector for adversaries who attempt to brute force user accounts or attempt to steal credentials via phishing or social engineering.
The following three kinds of MFA solution are some of the most popular, but other exist. It’s important that you find the right ones for your needs before you start implementing, since there is always a trade-off between cost, management, security and ease of use to consider.
Physical tokens, such as the RSA key fobs many of us have seen provided by our banks in the past, provide an effective second factor of authentication. Tokens have their time synchronised with a server so that the server knowns which one-time code should be entered by the user. The user will be required to provide the one-time code, along with their username and password, before the system grants access. The biggest drawback of token-based MFA solutions is they are expensive and user enrolment can be an overhead for your service management team.
Something you are translates into providing a physical authenticator to prove a user is who they say they are. Biometric scans of fingerprints or the user’s iris can be used in an multi-factor authentication architecture. The user will need to enrol in MFA architecture by first scanning the appropriate biometric before the system can tie it to a user, so the enrolment process needs to have reasonable procedural security around it. The authentication service can then use the input of the biometric along with the username and password to verify the identity of and authenticate the user. Many devices come with biometric readers in them, however, be careful not to replace one single factor authentication solution with another. Replacing a password or pin entry on your phone with a fingerprint or facial scan doesn’t improve your security posture – it just changes the attack vector.
Some multi-factor authentication solutions provide a one-time PIN or passphrase as an SMS message, email or voice call to the user. The logon process is interrupted after the user inputs their username and password, where they must wait until they receive their SMS message, then they need to input that into a new dialog box presented on the screen. The key to the strength of this authentication method is the guarantee that the enrolled phone or email address is still under the control of the user. If the user’s personal information was stolen in a data breach, then their account might already be taken over by an attacker. Therefore, any authenticator going to their email might be intercepted by a hacker.
Using Multi-factor authentication can significantly improve your security posture, especially for protecting remote access systems and highly privileged accounts, like administrators and executives. Many solutions exist, but there is always a trade-off between security, usability and cost to consider before you decide to proceed with an implementation.
Many online services now integrate their own version of MFA into their settings. It’s advisable that businesses encourage their users to learn about the MFA capabilities of the services they use and turn them on. Enrolling a mobile phone into an MFA solution that sends an SMS to the user during the login process is straightforward and one of the quickest and cheapest architectures to roll out to an enterprise.
The additional security events and intelligence that an enterprise security team will acquire from a good MFA solution helps security analysts hunt for authentication related threats and shows them where attackers are targeting their systems. Multi-factor authentication provides a positive security uplift to your enterprise security posture.
 The Essential Eight mitigation strategy, Multi Factor Authentication, is covered in full here:
A recent KPMG Report suggests that protecting against and dealing with cyber risks will be the major challenge for senior executives in 2024. It is clear that despite high levels of security investment, organisations continue to suffer from cyber attacks.Read more
The Australian Signals Directorate’s (ASD) recent publication of their Cyber Threat Report 2022-2023 unearthed a range of areas for concern for government departments and critical infrastructure entities at local, State and Federal level.Read more
As cyber risks increase, organisations are encountering the longer life cycle of insurance renewals and the need to demonstrate better management of security controls and their effectiveness.Read more
Highlights and insights from the recent Managed Services Summit in London & the ISACA Central Chapter Conference on Digital Trust, in Birmingham, UK. With two recent conferences in the space of three days, some interesting challenges were very evident in the topics discussed. Being very different events, the challenges were quite different, but interestingly they […]Read more
In early August 2023, the latest joint advisory on persistent vulnerabilities was issued by the intelligence and security agencies of the “Five-eyes” community. These joint advisories are becoming more common. Perhaps recognising the growing importance of shared security information and the common nature of many of the threats faced – the weight they carry makes […]Read more
The quality of your risk assessment and the security information it provides is important; if you plan to use it to actively manage your operational and cyber resilience activities. Organisations are constantly exposed to a rapidly changing threat environment, so you really need a similarly rapid evidence-based feedback system that informs you of the ongoing […]Read more
The UK market has its own regulators, security standards and challenges. And while rulings from SEC in the US or the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) in Australia don’t apply to UK companies, for the most part, the observations are undoubtedly relevant and the resulting advice instructive. It would be wrong to think UK financial […]Read more
<<< Part 2a: Australia’s Essential Eight: Beyond Endpoint Control <<< Part 2b: Activating UK NCSC & US NIST Guidelines: Beyond Endpoint Control Part 4: Systematic Measurement of Cyber Controls >>> As much as we invest into cyber security controls, external threats are inevitable. In a recent Notifiable Data Breaches Report from the Office of the […]Read more
Keen campers, scouts and even the Swiss Army know – that a good penknife is indispensable. This simple device has mitigated many a disaster at one point in time or another. Whether it’s to cut through a bit of string, tighten a screw or simply to solve the problem of no bottle opener in the […]Read more
Supply chain risk is an area of cyber security that demands the ongoing attention of every enterprise; because it can make the difference between being resilient or not. It’s no surprise that insurers warn that the vulnerability of supply chains is potentially a systemic risk that can quickly propagate across supply chain dominated industries. Organisations […]Read more
Read by directors, executives, and security professionals globally, operating in the most complex of security environments.