Our cyber security products span from our next gen SIEM used in the most secure government and critical infrastructure environments, to automated cyber risk reporting applications for commercial and government organisations of all sizes.
The Australian Signals Directorate (ASD) published a list of prioritised cyber mitigation strategies in February 2017 that they claim will protect organisations against as many as 85% of targeted cyber-attacks. Known as the ASD Essential Eight, there is no doubt in anyone’s mind that these controls can reduce security incidents. Multi-factor authentication (MFA) is one of these eight controls, where ASD says multiple levels of authentication make it much more difficult for attackers to hijack a user’s account.
Passwords are ubiquitous as a form of authenticating a user’s identity but for some time have also been seen as one of the weakest aspects of an organisation’s security architecture. There is also a misconception that additional levels of authentication, such as integration of RSA Tokens or Smartcards into the authentication mechanism will add significant cost. However, MFA ensures the user is granted access only after presenting multiple, separate credentials, usually from multiple categories, thus significantly improving the overall efficacy of the authentication service. MFA services are often split into the following three categories:
Something you know (password)
Something you have (token)
Something you are (fingerprint, iris scan, facial recognition)
Multi-Factor Authentication solutions incorporate something you know with something you have or something you are, to have the user present two or even three separate credentials to the authenticating system. Even social media services and email providers these days, such as Microsoft, Apple and Google, are incorporating MFA into their architecture to protect their users from account hijacking. It’s time that MFA was considered a mandatory component of security architecture rather than optional. Let’s look at MFA in more detail.
During an attack, hackers will attempt to steal a user’s authentication information (username and password). The ultimate prize is to bag an administrative account with full privileges – of course, adversaries will settle for access to a standard user account, especially if it is a high-value user such as a financial controller or executive. Once an attacker gains access to a legitimate account, in most cases, all bets are off. Few organisations configure logging and auditing systems to monitor real users going about their normal business, so the attacker can start canvassing the network, looking for ways to monetise their new-found freedom on your systems.
Caution: Multi-factor authentication is often confused with multi-step authentication. Don’t be led into a false sense of security by thinking a second level of authentication into an application server (for example) provides the same level of protection as MFA. Sequentially authenticating to multiple authentication providers will still leave any one of those functions open to brute force attacks or replay attacks.
There are dozens of Multi-factor authentication solutions on the market and it’s really a matter of picking the one that best suits your business needs. Remote access is often the place where businesses start incorporating MFA into their architecture, since remote access solutions open up an attack vector for adversaries who attempt to brute force user accounts or attempt to steal credentials via phishing or social engineering.
The following three kinds of MFA solution are some of the most popular, but other exist. It’s important that you find the right ones for your needs before you start implementing, since there is always a trade-off between cost, management, security and ease of use to consider.
Physical tokens, such as the RSA key fobs many of us have seen provided by our banks in the past, provide an effective second factor of authentication. Tokens have their time synchronised with a server so that the server knowns which one-time code should be entered by the user. The user will be required to provide the one-time code, along with their username and password, before the system grants access. The biggest drawback of token-based MFA solutions is they are expensive and user enrolment can be an overhead for your service management team.
Something you are translates into providing a physical authenticator to prove a user is who they say they are. Biometric scans of fingerprints or the user’s iris can be used in an multi-factor authentication architecture. The user will need to enrol in MFA architecture by first scanning the appropriate biometric before the system can tie it to a user, so the enrolment process needs to have reasonable procedural security around it. The authentication service can then use the input of the biometric along with the username and password to verify the identity of and authenticate the user. Many devices come with biometric readers in them, however, be careful not to replace one single factor authentication solution with another. Replacing a password or pin entry on your phone with a fingerprint or facial scan doesn’t improve your security posture – it just changes the attack vector.
Some multi-factor authentication solutions provide a one-time PIN or passphrase as an SMS message, email or voice call to the user. The logon process is interrupted after the user inputs their username and password, where they must wait until they receive their SMS message, then they need to input that into a new dialog box presented on the screen. The key to the strength of this authentication method is the guarantee that the enrolled phone or email address is still under the control of the user. If the user’s personal information was stolen in a data breach, then their account might already be taken over by an attacker. Therefore, any authenticator going to their email might be intercepted by a hacker.
Using Multi-factor authentication can significantly improve your security posture, especially for protecting remote access systems and highly privileged accounts, like administrators and executives. Many solutions exist, but there is always a trade-off between security, usability and cost to consider before you decide to proceed with an implementation.
Many online services now integrate their own version of MFA into their settings. It’s advisable that businesses encourage their users to learn about the MFA capabilities of the services they use and turn them on. Enrolling a mobile phone into an MFA solution that sends an SMS to the user during the login process is straightforward and one of the quickest and cheapest architectures to roll out to an enterprise.
The additional security events and intelligence that an enterprise security team will acquire from a good MFA solution helps security analysts hunt for authentication related threats and shows them where attackers are targeting their systems. Multi-factor authentication provides a positive security uplift to your enterprise security posture.
 The Essential Eight mitigation strategy, Multi Factor Authentication, is covered in full here:
<<< Part 2a: Australia’s Essential Eight: Beyond Endpoint Control <<< Part 2b: Activating UK NCSC & US NIST Guidelines: Beyond Endpoint Control Part 4: Systematic Measurement of Cyber Controls >>> As much as we invest into cyber security controls, external threats are inevitable. In a recent Notifiable Data Breaches Report from the Office of the […]Read more
Keen campers, scouts and even the Swiss Army know – that a good penknife is indispensable. This simple device has mitigated many a disaster at one point in time or another. Whether it’s to cut through a bit of string, tighten a screw or simply to solve the problem of no bottle opener in the […]Read more
Supply chain risk is an area of cyber security that demands the ongoing attention of every enterprise; because it can make the difference between being resilient or not. It’s no surprise that insurers warn that the vulnerability of supply chains is potentially a systemic risk that can quickly propagate across supply chain dominated industries. Organisations […]Read more
It took a “tripartite cyber assessment” by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) to identify that a sample of financial organisations had inadequate cyber security: poor security control management, a lack of business recovery planning and inadequate 3rd party risk assessment. Why were there gaps? Where is the failure? Clearly the common practice of unsubstantiated […]Read more
The discussion over data-driven vs qualitative cyber security assessment has been going for some time. Nowadays, it is at the top of the priority list for many security and senior executive teams. Managing cyber security has always been a noble ambition but without reliable measurement, the lack of actionable information makes evidence-based management decisions almost […]Read more
Attack Surface Management (ASM) characterises a business’s security risks as the monitoring and risk mitigation of a constantly changing and vulnerable “risk-surface”. Importantly, this attack surface extends to both internal and external assets and services. Some ASM solutions deliver clear visibility across both Internet facing and internal assets. Others do not. Instead, they assess external […]Read more
The UK Government has released its annual “Cyber Security Breaches Survey 2023”. It provides some valuable insights into how cyber security is currently being managed in the UK, by a range of organisations. It also speaks to how current competing economic priorities are impacting the effectiveness of some cyber security management efforts. The full report […]Read more
Solving the mismatch between cyber security reporting and directors’ requirements You are undoubtedly familiar with the headlines; you may have even become in part desensitised to them: ‘Cyber-attacks are increasingly damaging’, or ‘large amounts of personal data are most at risk’. The important take-away, however, is that modern day thieves can easily gain access to […]Read more
A system to address the untrustworthy security environment Zero trust approaches to security have been talked about for a while; but in recent times they have certainly gained more currency. As a model for protecting data and services, the simplicity of the concept is its biggest strength – assume, as a default position, there is […]Read more
The ongoing protection of Critical Infrastructure from cyber-attacks has implications for us all – whether it’s supporting our health, well-being or simply our way of life, there is good reason to reflect on the effectiveness your cyber security. Cyber security risks are nothing new and the vulnerability of critical infrastructure to them (and the heightened […]Read more
Read by directors, executives, and security professionals globally, operating in the most complex of security environments.