Our cyber security products span from our next gen SIEM used in the most secure government and critical infrastructure environments, to automated cyber risk reporting applications for commercial and government organisations of all sizes.
Managed security services is a fast growing industry and nearly every MSSP we talk to is looking to drive growth through the acquisition of new customers. However, making this growth profitable and scalable relies heavily on the capabilities their technology platforms have in a specific area – Multi-Tenancy.
The SIEM and Security Analytics markets are relatively mature, with many available solutions being 10+ years old. Most solutions were designed for on-premise deployment for a single customer. As such they are expected to be set-up and configured once only.
By contrast an MSSP needs to minimise overhead when onboarding each new customer and to be able to manage many customers from a single SIEM via a single console. They need to deploy the core technology once (as per an enterprise) but then add “deployments” as they attract new customers to their service.
The repeated set-up and configuration of the software is the hidden cost of SIEM technologies that are not multi-tenanted.
With a stand-alone or even federated solution, on-boarding each new customer is like starting from scratch every time; you need to deploy the software, configure rules, alerts, dashboards and reports.
A multi-tenancy SIEM solution, only needs to be set up once, for the initial SOC platform and/or first customer. Any additional customers use the configuration that’s already in place (perhaps with some customisations). This means you can house 20-30 plus customers on a single platform giving lots of additional savings and the ability to grow revenue faster.
The steps involved in building the core SIEM platform and accepting the first customer is the same, whether you use a standalone SIEM or a multi-tenancy one:
But for every customer after that, it is very different. A multi-tenancy SIEM skips a number of the steps, saving a significant amount of time and effort for all additional customers:
If the growth plan for your managed security services business is to add 10/20/50 or even 100 new customers, then the operation needs to be scalable.
If the configuration of each new customer takes 1, 2 or 3 days it’s easy to see how this can build up and potentially delay the commencement of services (and hence revenue). It could also pull engineering resources away from other tasks or disrupt the operation of the security services for other customers.
Again, and again we have found that multi-tenancy is the key reason that MSSPs switch to our SIEM; having a scalable multi-tenancy SIEM is fundamental to providing a successful managed security service.
We have a case study at: https://www.huntsmansecurity.com/resource/case-studies/developing-managed-security-services/
Visit the product page at: https://www.huntsmansecurity.com/products/next-gen-siem-mssp/
See our other blog post on how multi-tenancy can also help with the ongoing operation of a security services.
<<< Part 2a: Australia’s Essential Eight: Beyond Endpoint Control <<< Part 2b: Activating UK NCSC & US NIST Guidelines: Beyond Endpoint Control Part 4: Systematic Measurement of Cyber Controls >>> As much as we invest into cyber security controls, external threats are inevitable. In a recent Notifiable Data Breaches Report from the Office of the […]Read more
Keen campers, scouts and even the Swiss Army know – that a good penknife is indispensable. This simple device has mitigated many a disaster at one point in time or another. Whether it’s to cut through a bit of string, tighten a screw or simply to solve the problem of no bottle opener in the […]Read more
Supply chain risk is an area of cyber security that demands the ongoing attention of every enterprise; because it can make the difference between being resilient or not. It’s no surprise that insurers warn that the vulnerability of supply chains is potentially a systemic risk that can quickly propagate across supply chain dominated industries. Organisations […]Read more
It took a “tripartite cyber assessment” by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) to identify that a sample of financial organisations had inadequate cyber security: poor security control management, a lack of business recovery planning and inadequate 3rd party risk assessment. Why were there gaps? Where is the failure? Clearly the common practice of unsubstantiated […]Read more
The discussion over data-driven vs qualitative cyber security assessment has been going for some time. Nowadays, it is at the top of the priority list for many security and senior executive teams. Managing cyber security has always been a noble ambition but without reliable measurement, the lack of actionable information makes evidence-based management decisions almost […]Read more
Attack Surface Management (ASM) characterises a business’s security risks as the monitoring and risk mitigation of a constantly changing and vulnerable “risk-surface”. Importantly, this attack surface extends to both internal and external assets and services. Some ASM solutions deliver clear visibility across both Internet facing and internal assets. Others do not. Instead, they assess external […]Read more
The UK Government has released its annual “Cyber Security Breaches Survey 2023”. It provides some valuable insights into how cyber security is currently being managed in the UK, by a range of organisations. It also speaks to how current competing economic priorities are impacting the effectiveness of some cyber security management efforts. The full report […]Read more
Solving the mismatch between cyber security reporting and directors’ requirements You are undoubtedly familiar with the headlines; you may have even become in part desensitised to them: ‘Cyber-attacks are increasingly damaging’, or ‘large amounts of personal data are most at risk’. The important take-away, however, is that modern day thieves can easily gain access to […]Read more
A system to address the untrustworthy security environment Zero trust approaches to security have been talked about for a while; but in recent times they have certainly gained more currency. As a model for protecting data and services, the simplicity of the concept is its biggest strength – assume, as a default position, there is […]Read more
The ongoing protection of Critical Infrastructure from cyber-attacks has implications for us all – whether it’s supporting our health, well-being or simply our way of life, there is good reason to reflect on the effectiveness your cyber security. Cyber security risks are nothing new and the vulnerability of critical infrastructure to them (and the heightened […]Read more
Read by directors, executives, and security professionals globally, operating in the most complex of security environments.