Our cyber security products span from our next gen SIEM used in the most secure government and critical infrastructure environments, to automated cyber risk reporting applications for commercial and government organisations of all sizes.
The success of a modern cyber security operations centre (SOC) is only possible with the right balance of systems, people and culture. Cyber security analysts need to work as a team, leveraging strengths and supporting weaknesses to deliver the best security outcomes. Furthermore, technology must be adaptable to the business’s environment, allowing automated processes to underpin analysts’ activities.
Nevertheless, there is one significant issue that needs addressing before starting to automate parts of the cyber security process: Analysts must be confident in the technology to allow them to trust that nothing is being missed.
A SOC is a significant investment and requires careful planning, along with well-controlled integration with existing systems. The sophistication of modern cyber security threats makes detecting real attacks difficult, with most SOC technologies delivering more false positives than real threats.
The reality is that there is usually more work than a security team can cope with. So, the technology chosen for the SOC needs to be capable of automating as many routine tasks as possible. Furthermore, making sure the security workforce (both the existing team and new hires) are suitably trained to react to these new, sophisticated threats as quickly as possible.
There have been a variety of skills-related initiatives launched in an attempt to improve on the industry’s cyber skills shortage. The lack of suitably trained and experienced security professionals is one of the greatest threats to privacy and resilience in the modern age. This deficit will continue to be challenging for many years unless the problem starts to be tackled today, but doing more with less staff is certainly a reality for security managers.
It is heartening to hear of initiatives like Cisco’s investment programme, known as the Global Cybersecurity Scholarship . Hopefully this investment of $10 million will boost the available talent pool but for now, there is an ongoing need to focus on automating as many analyst tasks and reducing the workload as much as possible.
For organisations lucky enough to have the best people and technology in their SOC, there’s still something missing: the ability to respond to threats is impacted by increasingly large volumes of threat intelligence and data, resulting in analysts wasting time investigating large numbers of false positives and complex threats that sit within a growing queue of alerts. The time-at-risk for many organisations is unsatisfactorily long, with indicators of compromise getting lost in the noise, while operational risk increases through the vagaries of analyst subjectivity.
The answer lies in the approach to industrialising the organisation’s cyber security incident management. This needs to be a robust, systematic, repeatable process model that provides intelligent feedback that allows a cyber security management team to hone and improve the services that they provide to the business and customers alike.
The latest release of Huntsman Analyst Portal®, incorporating automated threat verification (ATV) can help automate the manually intensive tasks analysts undertake, verifying the nature of threats, while eliminating false positives.
Our ATV technology is truly game changing, with improved data visualisation and labour-saving tools that improve operational team efficiencies and, through automation, improve accuracy and streamline workflows. ATV offers an unsurpassed level of sophistication, automating event correlation across all log sources, thus ensuring analysts don’t get burned out chasing ghosts.
Huntsman Analyst Portal® delivers measurable improvements in operational efficiencies and summary screens allowing analysts to easily investigate and resolve threats. This helps establish the nature of the automated processes and satisfy analysts that the new way of operating can be trusted to demonstrate a repeatable outcome. This is an essential step in building trust before the automation process is fully operationalised.
Providing analysts with the option to quarantine malicious or suspicious activities, results in risks being safely isolated from operations until the threat has passed. This is part of Huntsman®’s wider development roadmap, where safe and trustworthy automation, building certainty so action can be taken quickly, is the underlying philosophy of everything we do.
By adopting a scientific approach to automation, Huntsman® has effectively redesigned the Incident Management process to address the modern threat landscape. This serves to free up analysts’ time for research so they can dig deeper into real cyber threats to support the objective of reducing cyber security risk to the business.
Further insights are available in our White paper, please download it below:
<<< Part 2a: Australia’s Essential Eight: Beyond Endpoint Control <<< Part 2b: Activating UK NCSC & US NIST Guidelines: Beyond Endpoint Control Part 4: Systematic Measurement of Cyber Controls >>> As much as we invest into cyber security controls, external threats are inevitable. In a recent Notifiable Data Breaches Report from the Office of the […]Read more
Keen campers, scouts and even the Swiss Army know – that a good penknife is indispensable. This simple device has mitigated many a disaster at one point in time or another. Whether it’s to cut through a bit of string, tighten a screw or simply to solve the problem of no bottle opener in the […]Read more
Supply chain risk is an area of cyber security that demands the ongoing attention of every enterprise; because it can make the difference between being resilient or not. It’s no surprise that insurers warn that the vulnerability of supply chains is potentially a systemic risk that can quickly propagate across supply chain dominated industries. Organisations […]Read more
It took a “tripartite cyber assessment” by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) to identify that a sample of financial organisations had inadequate cyber security: poor security control management, a lack of business recovery planning and inadequate 3rd party risk assessment. Why were there gaps? Where is the failure? Clearly the common practice of unsubstantiated […]Read more
The discussion over data-driven vs qualitative cyber security assessment has been going for some time. Nowadays, it is at the top of the priority list for many security and senior executive teams. Managing cyber security has always been a noble ambition but without reliable measurement, the lack of actionable information makes evidence-based management decisions almost […]Read more
Attack Surface Management (ASM) characterises a business’s security risks as the monitoring and risk mitigation of a constantly changing and vulnerable “risk-surface”. Importantly, this attack surface extends to both internal and external assets and services. Some ASM solutions deliver clear visibility across both Internet facing and internal assets. Others do not. Instead, they assess external […]Read more
The UK Government has released its annual “Cyber Security Breaches Survey 2023”. It provides some valuable insights into how cyber security is currently being managed in the UK, by a range of organisations. It also speaks to how current competing economic priorities are impacting the effectiveness of some cyber security management efforts. The full report […]Read more
Solving the mismatch between cyber security reporting and directors’ requirements You are undoubtedly familiar with the headlines; you may have even become in part desensitised to them: ‘Cyber-attacks are increasingly damaging’, or ‘large amounts of personal data are most at risk’. The important take-away, however, is that modern day thieves can easily gain access to […]Read more
A system to address the untrustworthy security environment Zero trust approaches to security have been talked about for a while; but in recent times they have certainly gained more currency. As a model for protecting data and services, the simplicity of the concept is its biggest strength – assume, as a default position, there is […]Read more
The ongoing protection of Critical Infrastructure from cyber-attacks has implications for us all – whether it’s supporting our health, well-being or simply our way of life, there is good reason to reflect on the effectiveness your cyber security. Cyber security risks are nothing new and the vulnerability of critical infrastructure to them (and the heightened […]Read more
Read by directors, executives, and security professionals globally, operating in the most complex of security environments.